Undergrad Solving the Wave Equation via complex coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the wave equation using complex coordinates, specifically through the application of the Cauchy residue theorem. The user explores the relationship between complex functions and the wave equation, questioning how to handle integrals when given a specific source. There is a clarification regarding the second derivative and its implications for the Klein-Gordon equation, alongside considerations of boundary conditions and initial states. The conversation also touches on the nature of signal propagation and the potential for compactness to address issues related to infinite diffusion speeds. Overall, the thread seeks insights into applying complex analysis to wave equations and related mathematical challenges.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I'm looking for material about the following approach : If one suppose a function over complex numbers ##f(x+iy)## then

##\frac{df}{dz}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{1}{\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{1}{\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-i \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}##

Hence the wave equation with source g reads

##Re(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial z^2})=g(x+iy)##

Using Cauchy residue theorem

##Im(\oint\frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^3}dz)=\pi g(a)##

Then if the source is the function itself we can obtain the total function out of the contour integral over the boundary condition for example.

However I seek to use this method to solve the wave equation given another source and don't know how to solve the integral equation. Does anyone know how this could be done ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write the Laplacian in terms of complex co-ordinates, I'm not sure you can do this for the wave equation though, as you have a minus sign to contend with.
 
Ok, I have to check, but is it correct that gives the solution of the Klein-Gordon equation with a quantization due to the winding number ?
 
Oops, I made mistakes.

1) ##\frac{d}{dz}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}-i\frac{\partial}{\partial y})##

I forgot also that ##y=ct##

Then we have to derive twice

##f(z)=\frac{n_\gamma(z)}{2\pi i}\oint_\gamma\frac{f(s)}{z-s}ds##

Towards ##z## :

##\frac{d^2}{dz^2}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-2i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{c\partial t}##

This seems more clear to ask the questions :

1) is the product of operator derivative a second order derivative or the square of the first derivative : ##\frac{\partial^2\psi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}\neq\left(\frac{\partial\psi(x,t)}{\partial x}\right)^2##

2) in deriving the Cauchy formula wrt. ##z## assuming the endstate were zero as well as the boundary but the initial state uniformly distributed, then there are 3 termd, the first involving second derivative of ##n_\gamma(z)## which gives a derivative of a delta and the integral gives a log type result. I don't know if this is correct ?

But assuming this would imply the square of the log is decreasing and then increasing, like a Bell signal.

But increasing signals with the distance is contrary to all forces in the nature ? Hence there shall be a maximal distance for intrication ?
 
Erratum : the imaginary part of theexpression in the integral is of the form ##\frac{ct}{(x-s)^2+c^2t^2}ds## so it is not a log but an arctan.
 
Addendum : if this is correct it could permit in particular to solve a lot of equations of the type ##\box\psi=f(\psi)## even with the requirement of compactness between an initial and and a final condition.

(Could The compactness solve for example the problem of infinite speed of diffusion of a delta localized particle ?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K