Solving this problem using the energy method

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using the energy method to solve a problem involving a system's energy changes due to tension and mass leakage. The key point is the derivation of the expression dx/x, which represents the fraction of mass lost as the mass moves an incremental distance. Participants highlight the confusion surrounding the relationship between energy and mass, emphasizing that the energy loss must consider the current mass rather than the initial mass. A correct approach involves relating the change in energy to the current mass as the mass leaks, leading to a more accurate understanding of the system's dynamics. Clarification on these concepts is essential for correctly applying the energy method in this scenario.
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
This is the exercise from Morin's book on classical mechanics. The problem is as follows:
Consider a leaky bucket pulled by a string towards wall(see screenshot). The bucket leaks all the way which is constant (i.e ##dm/dx = \lambda## where m is the instantaneous mass of bucket. He asks to calculate kinetic energy as the function of distance
Relevant Equations
##dE/dx= F##
I attempted the solution using force method. I got correct. However, I was stuck at the alternative way to solve problem using energy method. As shown in screenshot 2, he tells that the energy of system changes due to 2 ways:
- The tension T
- Leaking of mass

As shown in screenshot 2 ,the leaking of mass contributes dx/x. My question is how this expression comes up? Please detailed justification and Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-53-33.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-53-33.png
    40.6 KB · Views: 443
  • Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-41-44.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-41-44.png
    42.1 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
As the mass moves an incremental distance x, it loses a fraction of its mass. If it is at distance 10 and moves incrementally by dx, it will lose dx/10 of its mass. If it is at distance x, it will lose a fraction, dx/x, of its mass.

If it loses dx/x of its mass, it loses dx/x of its energy.

Just as Morin says, the contribution to dE from this is E dx/x.
 
Last edited:
Abhishek11235 said:
My question is how this expression comes up
It is confusing because of the way x is defined.
Try obtaining the equation for m as a function of x. The leak contributes ##\frac 12 v^2dm## to dE. Substitute for ##v^2## using E.
 
jbriggs444 said:
As the mass moves an incremental distance x, it loses a fraction of its mass. If it is at distance 10 and moves incrementally by dx, it will lose dx/10 of its mass. If it is at distance x, it will lose a fraction, dx/x, of its mass.

If it loses dx/x of its mass, it loses dx/x of its energy.

Just as Morin says, the contribution to dE from this is E dx/x.
How can it lose dx/x fraction? The rate of leaking is constant. So ##dE= 1/2 dm v^2 = 1/2 \lambda dx v^2 = E dx/L## since ##\lambda= M/L##. I want justification for dx/x.
 
haruspex said:
It is confusing because of the way x is defined.
Try obtaining the equation for m as a function of x. The leak contributes ##\frac 12 v^2dm## to dE. Substitute for ##v^2## using E.
I got E dx/L as I showed above
 
Abhishek11235 said:
The rate of leaking is constant. So ##dE= 1/2 dm v^2 = 1/2 \lambda dx v^2 = E dx/L##.
The last equality is not correct. It looks like you assumed that ##E = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2##. But the mass of sand in the bucket is not ##M## (except at the initial point of release).
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
TSny said:
The last equality is not correct. It looks like you assumed that ##E = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2##. But the mass of sand in the bucket is not ##M## (except at the initial point of release).
Ok. So, I tried doing the dE. However,to get correct answer I have to assume dm/dx= M/x. Otherwise I get L everytime. Can you elaborate your answer please?
 
Abhishek11235 said:
Ok. So, I tried doing the dE. However,to get correct answer I have to assume dm/dx= M/x. Otherwise I get L everytime. Can you elaborate your answer please?
As @TSny writes, you substituted E/M for ½v2, but E depends on the current mass, m, not the initial mass, M
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
904
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K