Solving Torque Problem: Unknown Forces & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Antunovic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a torque problem involving forces acting on a beam, with specific focus on the calculation of torque and the identification of unknown forces. Participants are exploring the correct application of torque equations and the implications of their chosen reference points and directions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of different symbols for torque and the implications of their choices. There are attempts to clarify the relationships between forces acting on the beam, particularly the tension in the wire and the reaction forces at points A and B. Questions arise regarding the inclusion of certain components in torque calculations and the proper setup of free body diagrams.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct approach to summing moments and identifying forces, while others are reflecting on their misunderstandings and seeking clarification. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces involved, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by multiple unknowns in their equations and the potential confusion stemming from the notation used for torque and tension. The discussion also highlights the importance of accurately representing forces in free body diagrams to aid in understanding the problem.

Ivan Antunovic
Messages
109
Reaction score
4
I used symbol M for torque by my mistake in equations,(because M is used in my language),If I am right americans use symbol T for torque.

At equation (1) I get two unknowns : force T and force Rbx
tried more equations but it gets more complicated,what am I doing wrong...

note:I've choosen point A for calculating torque!
 

Attachments

  • TORQUE.jpg
    TORQUE.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 373
  • DSC_0620.JPG
    DSC_0620.JPG
    18.4 KB · Views: 389
  • DSC_0621.JPG
    DSC_0621.JPG
    31.9 KB · Views: 383
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan Antunovic said:
I used symbol M for torque by my mistake in equations,(because M is used in my language),If I am right americans use symbol T for torque.

At equation (1) I get two unknowns : force T and force Rbx
tried more equations but it gets more complicated,what am I doing wrong...

note:I've choosen point A for calculating torque and also clockwise direction is chosen to be NEGATIVE,counter clockwise is chosen POSITIVE !
 
Ivan Antunovic said:
I used symbol M for torque by my mistake in equations,(because M is used in my language),If I am right americans use symbol T for torque.

At equation (1) I get two unknowns : force T and force Rbx
tried more equations but it gets more complicated,what am I doing wrong...

note:I've choosen point A for calculating torque!
Speaking as an American, I use M for 'moment', rather than torque. Using T for 'torque' gets confusing, since T is often used for 'Tension'.

In your equation (1), you have written (√3 / 3) * RBx as one of the components of the moment about A. Since you have already included the forces in the wire in calculating the moment about A, this is an unnecessary and incorrect inclusion in your moment summation.

The correct moment summation about A allows you to calculate the magnitude of the tension T in the wire, which can then be used to determine the reaction at A. You are also including the vertical component of the tension in the wire twice in equation (2), once as RBy and again as Ty.

A proper free body drawing of the beam ADC would include the beam and the components of the tension in the wire at C. Since the beam is in equilibrium and there is only the wire between C and B, once you determine the tension in the wire, the reactions at point B are automatically known. There is no need to include the components of RB in your force summation.
 
SteamKing said:
Speaking as an American, I use M for 'moment', rather than torque. Using T for 'torque' gets confusing, since T is often used for 'Tension'.

In your equation (1), you have written (√3 / 3) * RBx as one of the components of the moment about A. Since you have already included the forces in the wire in calculating the moment about A, this is an unnecessary and incorrect inclusion in your moment summation.

The correct moment summation about A allows you to calculate the magnitude of the tension T in the wire, which can then be used to determine the reaction at A. You are also including the vertical component of the tension in the wire twice in equation (2), once as RBy and again as Ty.

A proper free body drawing of the beam ADC would include the beam and the components of the tension in the wire at C. Since the beam is in equilibrium and there is only the wire between C and B, once you determine the tension in the wire, the reactions at point B are automatically known. There is no need to include the components of RB in your force summation.

So RBy and Ty are basically the same forces? I thought RBy is the force of the reaction that wall produces on the rod,but when I think of it must be the same thing because Tension is actually produced by gravitational force that pulls down the rod and they are obviously both in the same direction.(hope you understand my thought)

So I get from equation (1) that T= (2.58)/(3*10^4) =7.75 kN ?
 
Ivan Antunovic said:
So RBy and Ty are basically the same forces? I thought RBy is the force of the reaction that wall produces on the rod,but when I think of it must be the same thing because Tension is actually produced by gravitational force that pulls down the rod and they are obviously both in the same direction.(hope you understand my thought)

That's why it's important to learn how to draw a proper free body diagram: it allows you to isolate only the forces acting directly on the member of interest.
The reactions at point A directly influence what happens to the beam, from the standpoint of its equilibrium. The same cannot be said of the reactions at B, because their influence has already been taken into account by including the tension in the wire, which acts to keep the beam in equilibrium under the action of the load G.

So I get from equation (1) that T= (2.58)/(3*10^4) =7.75 kN ?
You've made a slight mistake in writing your moments from one line to the next.

The moment due to load G = 2 m × 10 kN = 20 kN-m = 2 × 104 N-m

T = 2 × 104 N-m / 2.58 m = 7.75 × 103 N = 7.75 kN
 
SteamKing said:
That's why it's important to learn how to draw a proper free body diagram: it allows you to isolate only the forces acting directly on the member of interest.
The reactions at point A directly influence what happens to the beam, from the standpoint of its equilibrium. The same cannot be said of the reactions at B, because their influence has already been taken into account by including the tension in the wire, which acts to keep the beam in equilibrium under the action of the load G.You've made a slight mistake in writing your moments from one line to the next.

The moment due to load G = 2 m × 10 kN = 20 kN-m = 2 × 104 N-m

T = 2 × 104 N-m / 2.58 m = 7.75 × 103 N = 7.75 kN

Yes ,I've noticed that mistake in equation (1),that force RB only confused me,
and thank you for your help.
Ivan.
 
Ivan Antunovic said:
Yes ,I've noticed that mistake in equation (1),that force Rb at point B only confused me(notice it was already drawn in the task),
and thank you for your help.
Ivan.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
776
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
866