Solving Two Lenses In A Row Homework Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a lens problem involving a converging lens with a focal length of 20.0 cm and a diverging lens with a focal length of -10.0 cm, separated by 25.0 cm. The initial object is placed 60.0 cm in front of the converging lens, leading to a calculated image position of 30.0 cm, which is behind the second lens. Participants emphasize treating the image from the first lens as a virtual object for the second lens, requiring careful attention to sign conventions. The conversation highlights the importance of analyzing each lens separately to determine the final image position accurately. Understanding the relationships between object distances and lens separations is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
kkrizka
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two lenses, one converging with focal length 20.0cm and one diverging with focal length -10.0cm, are placed 25.cm apart. An object is placed 60.0cm in front of the converging lense. Determine the position of the final image.

Homework Equations


\frac{1}{s_i} + \frac{1}{s_o} = \frac{1}{f}


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the idea behind this problem is that the image of the first lense becomes the object for the second lense. So the first thing I did was to calculate the position of the image of the first lense.
s_i=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{f} - \frac{1}{s_o}}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{20} - \frac{1}{60}}=30cm
Now the part I am stuck on is that according to this, the image of the first lense is behind the second lense (the separation of the two lenses is only 25cm). I'm not sure where to go next.

Would it be sensible to say that you treat the image of the first lense as sort of a "virtual" object... Meaning that you have to look through the second lense towards the first image to see it. My problem with this is that if you look through the second lense is such a way, then the light rays are going away from you and will never hit your eyes.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're going about it the right way. You should be able to work out the object distance for the second lens in terms of their separation and the image distance from the first lens. Then you can work out the resulting image distance in terms of the focal lengths the separation and the object distance from the first lens.
 
Hmm, so it does not matter that the rays from the first lens go through the second lens and then form the first image?
 
the image that forms from the first lens will be a virtual object for the next lens. you need to make your sign convention follow along with this. Dont worry about the lenses in combination, just worry about them separately.
 
Ah thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K