Solving Vector Diagrams: Finding Displacements & Velocities

  • Thread starter Thread starter g9WfI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a projectile motion problem using vector diagrams to find displacements and velocities. Participants emphasize the importance of treating horizontal and vertical motions separately, utilizing kinematic equations for each direction. The correct approach involves calculating time from vertical displacement, which can then be used to find horizontal distance. Mixing velocity and displacement in calculations is highlighted as incorrect, with the correct tangent relationship being between the vertical and horizontal distances. The conversation concludes that while a vector diagram can illustrate velocity, the changing nature of velocity in projectile motion complicates its representation.
g9WfI
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A stone is thrown horizontally at 15 m/s from the top of a vertical cliff, 50 m above the sea. Calculate the distance from the bottom of the cliff to the place where the stone hits the water. g = 9.8 m/s^2
Relevant Equations
trig, suvat
Here is my attempt at the vector diagram:
IMG_6C9734C444CE-1.jpeg

Could anyone give me any clues as to where to go from here? Is this diagram correct?
I tried finding θ using inverse tan 50/15 but I don't think I can do that because that's mixing up velocity and displacement.

EDIT: I copied and pasted the incorrect mark scheme here.
Correct mark scheme:
For the fall, s = 50 m, u = 0, v = ?, a = 9.8 m s–2 , t = ?
s = ut + ½at2 ⇒ 50 m = 0 + 4.9 m s-2 × t 2 ⇒ t 2 = 50 m ÷ 4.9 m s–2 = 10.2 s2
t = √(10.2 s2 ) = 3.19 s
horizontally, s = ut = 15 m s–1 × 3.19 s = 48 m (2 s.f.)

How do I find the corresponding displacements/velocities of the vectors with only this information?
I don't know if I'm making much sense, but I don't understand how to get the displacement from velocity;
I know s = vt but I'm not really getting anywhere with my working.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure why you are attempting a vector diagram here. This is a projectile motion problem. One "secret" is to treat horizontal and vertical motions separately. First consider the vertical motion, since you have all the info you need to figure out the time it takes for the stone to hit the ground.
 
This is a projectile motion problem. Split the problem into the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) directions. Analyze the projectiles motion in each direction independently using the kinematic equations.
 
That diagram does not seem helpful.
You have already given the solution for the problem.

Velocity in the horizontal direction is constant.
Acceleration in the vertical direction is constant.
Time can be found by solving for time from the equation for vertical displacement, which you have given.
This can be used in the equation for horizontal distance to compute horizontal distance.
 
You can't mix vectors of different physical dimensionality like that. It doesn’t mean anything to add a velocity and a displacement.
 
Yes you are right that it is wrong to mix distance and velocity in ##\tan\theta=\frac{50}{15}##, instead you should say that ##\tan\theta=\frac{50}{48}## as i think you calculated correctly the horizontal distance to be 48m.

If you want a vector diagram for velocity the main problem is that the vector of velocity keeps changing in magnitude and direction for this problem. However in cartesian coordinate system the vector of velocity formula is $$\vec{v}(t)=v_x\hat x+v_y\hat y=15\hat x+9.8t\hat y$$ as the x-component of velocity is constant and equal to 15 but the y-component of velocity keeps changing as time passes and it is ##v_y=gt=9.8t## where t the time elapsed.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top