Solving Voltage Ripple Formula: Get the Right Answer!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a formula for calculating voltage ripple (Vr) in an electrical circuit, as encountered in an HND course. Participants are attempting to solve for Vr using provided values and are comparing their results with a reference answer from their university.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for calculating voltage ripple, but struggles to arrive at the expected answer of 7.46 volts.
  • Another participant questions the lack of units for the variables and the absence of a left-hand side in the equation, suggesting that this makes it difficult to solve for Vr.
  • A third participant expresses confusion about the formula, noting that a parameter typically included (π) is missing, and suggests that a circuit diagram might clarify the situation.
  • A later reply clarifies the definitions of the variables involved and acknowledges a typo in the value of Vc, which was initially stated incorrectly.
  • One participant realizes they have been neglecting to properly account for terms involving Vr in their calculations, indicating a misunderstanding in their approach to solving the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various uncertainties regarding the formula and its components, with no consensus reached on the correct approach to solving for Vr. Multiple competing views on the formula's structure and the expected parameters remain present.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the formula's derivation, the inclusion of certain constants, and the proper handling of terms in the equation. The discussion reflects a need for clarification on these points.

Rafeng404
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template when starting threads in the schoolwork forums
Hi lads,

Working through my HND course books and I have come across a formula that I cannot get to give me the same answer as the book. Nor can some of my engineering student friends.

Values are:

F=50
C=500^-6
Rl = 100
Vc=31.03

The formula is

=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))

Inputting the values to make it look clearer it becomes

= (1/5)*(41.03-(Vr/2))

Solve for Vr.

My attempt:

=0.2(41.03-(Vr/2))
=8.206 * 0.1Vr
Vr= 8.206/0.1
Vr = 82.06

Clearly we have missed something stupid here and transposed it wrong. I am a bit rusty but I have lent my maths bible to someone else.

The right answer according to the uni is 7.46.

Have I completely forgotten how to do maths?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rafeng404 said:
Hi lads,

Working through my HND course books and I have come across a formula that I cannot get to give me the same answer as the book. Nor can some of my engineering student friends.

Values are:

F=50
C=500^-6
Rl = 100
Vc=31.03

The formula is

=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))

Inputting the values to make it look clearer it becomes

= (1/5)*(41.03-(Vr/2))

Solve for Vr.

My attempt:

=0.2(41.03-(Vr/2))
=8.206 * 0.1Vr
Vr= 8.206/0.1
Vr = 82.06

Clearly we have missed something stupid here and transposed it wrong. I am a bit rusty but I have lent my maths bible to someone else.

The right answer according to the uni is 7.46.

Have I completely forgotten how to do maths?

Thanks in advance
Hello @Rafeng404,

It would greatly help if you clarified a few things:

  • Your values for F, C, Rl, and Vc don't have any units. I can assume that they're all in SI units, but it's good to specify.
  • In your formula, "=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))", there's nothing on the left hand side of the equation. What is all that equal to? You can't solve for Vr with nothing on the left-hand-side. It doesn't make any sense unless it is equal to something.
  • Where did this formula come from? Was it given to you like that or did you derive it in an intermediate step?
  • In my experience with these types of problems, I would expect there to be a \pi in your formula, usually between the 2 and the F_s. I find it curious that it's not present. Do you have any comments on this?
  • When specifying your constants, you stated that Vc = 31.03. But when plugging it into your formula it became 41.03. I don't know what to make of that.
  • In your attempted solution, I'm not sure how you solved for Vr since there was nothing originally on the left-hand-side of the equation. This goes back to an earlier bullet.
 
It is difficult to understand the formula. Usually s is the operational parameter but then you don't need F. If s=pi then the parameters are in complex Xc=-j1/(2*pi()*F*C). If the formula represents the current in a [mesh?] circuit the circuit diagram could be useful in order to solve the problem.
 
Lads,

Apologies, perhaps I should not have done this on my phone after a back shift.

1. F= frequency, C= capacitance, Rl = Load resistance, Vc = Peak voltage across capacitor, Vr = voltage ripple peak to peak.
2. The formula is for Vr ( see attached)
3. The formula is in our books, you need to transpose to get Vr (see attached)
4. I agree, normally I would expect to see Pi in a formula like this, perhaps this is where the uni has buggered up??
5. Vc is 41.03, the 31.01 is a typo

Hope this helps, Vr is what I am looking for.

I am sure there is something obvious that I am missing but I cannot seem to make it work for 7.46Volts.

Many thanks

upload_2017-8-31_7-25-41.png
 
Last edited:
Rafeng404 said:
My attempt:

Vr = 0.2(41.03 - (Vr/2))
.....⤴
=8.206 * 0.1Vr

Try simplifying that again, moving all Vr terms to the left side.
 
"ALL Vr terms" head slap! Bloody hell! cheers mate i realize what I haven't been doing now. I have been negating the first Vr term. I am such a spanner sometimes.

Thank you all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K