Solving Voltage Ripple Formula: Get the Right Answer!

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 5K views
Rafeng404
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template when starting threads in the schoolwork forums
Hi lads,

Working through my HND course books and I have come across a formula that I cannot get to give me the same answer as the book. Nor can some of my engineering student friends.

Values are:

F=50
C=500^-6
Rl = 100
Vc=31.03

The formula is

=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))

Inputting the values to make it look clearer it becomes

= (1/5)*(41.03-(Vr/2))

Solve for Vr.

My attempt:

=0.2(41.03-(Vr/2))
=8.206 * 0.1Vr
Vr= 8.206/0.1
Vr = 82.06

Clearly we have missed something stupid here and transposed it wrong. I am a bit rusty but I have lent my maths bible to someone else.

The right answer according to the uni is 7.46.

Have I completely forgotten how to do maths?

Thanks in advance
 
on Phys.org
Rafeng404 said:
Hi lads,

Working through my HND course books and I have come across a formula that I cannot get to give me the same answer as the book. Nor can some of my engineering student friends.

Values are:

F=50
C=500^-6
Rl = 100
Vc=31.03

The formula is

=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))

Inputting the values to make it look clearer it becomes

= (1/5)*(41.03-(Vr/2))

Solve for Vr.

My attempt:

=0.2(41.03-(Vr/2))
=8.206 * 0.1Vr
Vr= 8.206/0.1
Vr = 82.06

Clearly we have missed something stupid here and transposed it wrong. I am a bit rusty but I have lent my maths bible to someone else.

The right answer according to the uni is 7.46.

Have I completely forgotten how to do maths?

Thanks in advance
Hello @Rafeng404,

It would greatly help if you clarified a few things:

  • Your values for F, C, Rl, and Vc don't have any units. I can assume that they're all in SI units, but it's good to specify.
  • In your formula, "=(1/(2FsCRl))*(Vc-(Vr/2))", there's nothing on the left hand side of the equation. What is all that equal to? You can't solve for Vr with nothing on the left-hand-side. It doesn't make any sense unless it is equal to something.
  • Where did this formula come from? Was it given to you like that or did you derive it in an intermediate step?
  • In my experience with these types of problems, I would expect there to be a [itex]\pi[/itex] in your formula, usually between the 2 and the [itex]F_s[/itex]. I find it curious that it's not present. Do you have any comments on this?
  • When specifying your constants, you stated that Vc = 31.03. But when plugging it into your formula it became 41.03. I don't know what to make of that.
  • In your attempted solution, I'm not sure how you solved for Vr since there was nothing originally on the left-hand-side of the equation. This goes back to an earlier bullet.
 
It is difficult to understand the formula. Usually s is the operational parameter but then you don't need F. If s=pi then the parameters are in complex Xc=-j1/(2*pi()*F*C). If the formula represents the current in a [mesh?] circuit the circuit diagram could be useful in order to solve the problem.
 
Lads,

Apologies, perhaps I should not have done this on my phone after a back shift.

1. F= frequency, C= capacitance, Rl = Load resistance, Vc = Peak voltage across capacitor, Vr = voltage ripple peak to peak.
2. The formula is for Vr ( see attached)
3. The formula is in our books, you need to transpose to get Vr (see attached)
4. I agree, normally I would expect to see Pi in a formula like this, perhaps this is where the uni has buggered up??
5. Vc is 41.03, the 31.01 is a typo

Hope this helps, Vr is what I am looking for.

I am sure there is something obvious that I am missing but I cannot seem to make it work for 7.46Volts.

Many thanks

upload_2017-8-31_7-25-41.png
 
Last edited:
"ALL Vr terms" head slap! Bloody hell! cheers mate i realize what I haven't been doing now. I have been negating the first Vr term. I am such a spanner sometimes.

Thank you all.