Solving Wave Speed of a Violin String

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the wave speed of a violin string given its mass, length, and frequency. The problem is situated within the context of wave mechanics, specifically focusing on harmonics and wave properties in strings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the harmonic number and wave speed, questioning whether the first harmonic must be assumed. They consider alternative harmonics and their implications on the wave speed calculation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, examining different harmonic assumptions and their effects on the results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the frequency provided in the problem statement, and the necessity of knowing tension for further calculations has been highlighted.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the string's mass and frequency, but the tension is noted as a missing piece of information that is critical for complete analysis. Participants are also questioning the clarity of the problem statement regarding harmonic assumptions.

HHH
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A violin string with a mass of 0.35g is 33 cm long. The frequency of a wave supported by the string is 196 Hz.

What is the speed of the wave?

Homework Equations


Ln = n/2 *lambda
v = f*lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Solve for wave length [/B]
L1 = 1/2 *lambda
0.33 = 1/2 * lambda
0.33 *2 = lambda
0.66 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.66
v = 129.36 m/s

I just assumed you have to use first harmonic and got the right answer, but why do we have to use first harmonic? or is there another way to do it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HHH said:
is there another way to do it?
You mean, without assuming 1st harmonic?
What if you assume 2nd harmonic? Does that give a different answer?
 
haruspex said:
You mean, without assuming 1st harmonic?
What if you assume 2nd harmonic? Does that give a different answer?

1. Solve for wave length
L1 = 2/2 *lambda
0.33 = 2/2 * lambda
0.33 *1 = lambda
0.33 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.33
v = 64.68 m/s

I get that which is wrong
 
HHH said:
1. Solve for wave length
L1 = 2/2 *lambda
0.33 = 2/2 * lambda
0.33 *1 = lambda
0.33 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.33
v = 64.68 m/s

I get that which is wrong
Quite so. So it follows that it is necessary to assume a particular harmonic, right?
 
haruspex said:
Quite so. So it follows that it is necessary to assume a particular harmonic, right?
So is it just a poorly worded question. Or do you always use first harmonic if it doesn't say.

Also, In the question, it does however mention that the string supports 196Hz, so is that a minimum frequency→like a harmonic?
 
HHH said:
it does however mention that the string supports 196Hz, so is that a minimum frequency→like a harmonic?
No, I think that just means it is one of the frequencies at which it can vibrate.
I note that it does give you the mass of the string, but that's no use without knowing the tension. Is there a later part to the question that asks you to find the tension?
 
haruspex said:
No, I think that just means it is one of the frequencies at which it can vibrate.
I note that it does give you the mass of the string, but that's no use without knowing the tension. Is there a later part to the question that asks you to find the tension?
B) What is the linear density of the string?
C) What is the tension in the string?

Those are easy if you know the speed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K