MHB Solving \[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\] with a "Binary Search

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Search
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation \(x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\), users suggest employing numerical methods such as binary search or Newton's Method for approximating roots. While binary search provided some success, alternatives like using Wolfram Alpha for exact solutions are recommended. The rational root theorem is mentioned but noted as ineffective for this specific equation. The discussion highlights the challenges of solving quartic equations and the need for numerical approximation techniques. Overall, utilizing computational tools or established numerical methods is advised for finding solutions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...

It's not easy...
Quartic function - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A binary search or goal seek in excel are probably your best bets with a numerical approximation being next. Honestly this is one of those questions I'd just put into wolfram and use their answer(s)
 
Yankel said:
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...
You can occasionally use the rational root theorem, but it doesn't work for this equation.

-Dan
 
I understand, thank you !

What numerical approximation methods do we have to solve such equations ?
 
Yankel said:
I understand, thank you !

What numerical approximation methods do we have to solve such equations ?

Perhaps the best known is:

Newton's Method
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top