MHB Solving \[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\] with a "Binary Search

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Search
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation \(x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\), users suggest employing numerical methods such as binary search or Newton's Method for approximating roots. While binary search provided some success, alternatives like using Wolfram Alpha for exact solutions are recommended. The rational root theorem is mentioned but noted as ineffective for this specific equation. The discussion highlights the challenges of solving quartic equations and the need for numerical approximation techniques. Overall, utilizing computational tools or established numerical methods is advised for finding solutions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...

It's not easy...
Quartic function - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A binary search or goal seek in excel are probably your best bets with a numerical approximation being next. Honestly this is one of those questions I'd just put into wolfram and use their answer(s)
 
Yankel said:
Hello all

I am trying to draw a graph of a function. On the way, I wanted to see where the function meet the x axis, so I put y=0. It gave me this:

\[x^{4}-4x^{3}+10=0\]

How do I solve this equation ?

Thanks !

I tried a "binary search" and got really close to the answer, but I guess there must be a better way...
You can occasionally use the rational root theorem, but it doesn't work for this equation.

-Dan
 
I understand, thank you !

What numerical approximation methods do we have to solve such equations ?
 
Yankel said:
I understand, thank you !

What numerical approximation methods do we have to solve such equations ?

Perhaps the best known is:

Newton's Method
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top