Solving x in DE: sin(x)=t+c, No arcsin

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter simo1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation \( x' = \sec(x) \) with the initial condition \( x(0) = 2 \). Participants explore the implications of the solution \( \sin(x) = t + c \) and the constraints of not using the arcsin function to express \( x \). The conversation includes considerations of initial conditions and the behavior of the secant function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the solution \( \sin(x) = t + c \) is correct and can be derived from the differential equation.
  • There is a concern about the secant function being undefined at certain points, which may complicate the interpretation of the solution.
  • One participant suggests that avoiding the arcsin function may not be possible, indicating that it might be the only way to express \( x \).
  • Another participant mentions that while the solution can be left in the form \( \sin(x) = t + c \), it can also be expressed as \( x = \arcsin(t + c) \), which raises the issue of the restriction against using arcsin.
  • A later reply introduces a function \( \phi \) defined as \( \phi(\theta) = \sin(\theta) - \sin(2) \) and discusses its properties, including its derivative and initial condition, seeking clarification on how this function relates to the original problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of using the arcsin function to solve for \( x \). While some believe it is unavoidable, others explore alternative representations and interpretations of the solution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to avoid arcsin while still addressing the initial value problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the initial condition and the behavior of the secant function, which may introduce complexities in the solution process. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about how to express the solution without using arcsin.

simo1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I was given an DE equa x'=sec(x) : x(0)

I then solved it to
sin(x)= t + c(c0nstant)
but then I can't solve for x cause they say we shouldn't use arcsin. what can I do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: solving for x

simo said:
I was given an DE equa x'=sec(x) : x(0)

I then solved it to
sin(x)= t + c(c0nstant)
but then I can't solve for x cause they say we shouldn't use arcsin. what can I do
(i) What is the initial condition? x(0) = ??

(ii) There may be some trickery in this question. The sec function is undefined (or "infinite") at some points, so the equation needs to be interpreted cautiously at any such point.
 
Re: solving for x

Opalg said:
(i) What is the initial condition? x(0) = ??

(ii) There may be some trickery in this question. The sec function is undefined (or "infinite") at some points, so the equation needs to be interpreted cautiously at any such point.

it it x(0)=2
 
Re: solving for x

simo said:
it it x(0)=2
In that case I don't see any way of avoiding an inverse sin function.
 
Re: solving for x

Opalg said:
In that case I don't see any way of avoiding an inverse sin function.

are you saying the only way possible to solve this is by the arcsin
 
Re: solving for x

simo said:
are you saying the only way possible to solve this is by the arcsin
You solution $\sin x = t +c$ is correct. You can find the constant from the initial condition. Then you can either leave the solution in that form, or you can write it as $x = \arcsin(t+c)$. There is no way of writing the arcsin function in terms of other functions.
 
Re: solving for x

Opalg said:
You solution $\sin x = t +c$ is correct. You can find the constant from the initial condition. Then you can either leave the solution in that form, or you can write it as $x = \arcsin(t+c)$. There is no way of writing the arcsin function in terms of other functions.

there is a part that says I need a function that is a slotion of the IVP
now I looked at t and it is uniquely defined for each x in this this

sinx = t + sin(2)

Now they saying a function say ϕ:ϕ(Ɵ)= sin(Ɵ) - sin(2)
which is a solution of the IVP such that

ϕ' (Ɵ) = cos(Ɵ) with ϕ(2) = 0

may I get an explanation how one gets to this equation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K