Solving xy'(x) - y(x) = x^2 Exp[x] using the power series method

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation xy'(x) - y(x) = x^2 e^x using the power series method. The user initially struggles to find a recursive formula for the coefficients in their power series expansion of y. Suggestions include using the Taylor series for e^x and comparing powers of x, which leads to insights about the coefficients. The user realizes that they do not necessarily need a recursion formula, as they can directly derive the coefficients from the series expansion. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of flexibility in problem-solving approaches when dealing with differential equations.
Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
I've tried solving the equation xy'(x) - y(x) = x^2 Exp[x] using the power series method. I assume that y has the form:

y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n

Inserting this in the diff. eq. gives:

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n a_n x^n - \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n = x^2 e^x

Now, in the other types of diff. eqations I've solved using this method I found a recursive formula for the coefficients, but I don't see how I can do that here? How would I got about solving this problem?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try using the series for ex on the RHS. It's just a suggestion, so I don't know whether it'll work, but give it a go!
 
Yes, if you are required to use the series method, expand ex in Taylor's series and compare corresponding powers of x.

Of course, that's an "Euler type" equation so it should be easier to solve it directly, perhaps by converting to an equation with constant coefficients.
 
My problem is that I don't see how to obtain a recusion formula for the coefficients. Even when trying to solve just the corresponding homogeneous equation x y'(x) - y(x) = 0 I end up with something like n a_n - a_n = 0 and I can't see what to do.
 
Obviously, na_n- a_n= 0 is true as long as a_n= 0 for any n other than 1. For n= 1, the equation becomes a_1= a_1 which is also true- a_1 becomes the undetermined constant in your general solution. What that tells you is that the general solution to xy'(x)- y(x)= 0 is y(x)= Cx.
Since e^x= \Sigma_{n=0}^\infty\frac{1}{n!}x^n, x^2e^x= \Sigma_{n=0}^\infty\frac{1}{n!}x^{n+2}. If you let i= n+2, then you get x^2e^x= \Sigma_{i=2}^\infty\frac{1}{(i-2)!}x^i so you can compare "like powers".
You get (0)a_0- a_0= 0 so a_0= 0. (1)a_1- a_1= 0 which is always true- a_1 will be an "unknown constant".

For n> 1, na_n- a_n= a_n(n-1)= \frac{1}{(n-2)!} so
a_n= \frac{1}{(n-2)!(n-1)}[/itex].
 
Hmm, of course. Why did I not see that. I guess I was to focused on obtaining a recursion formula for the coefficients, because I thought I always had to do that. I see now that I don't. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K