I am trying to do some self-study and plow through Ballentine's book on Quantum Mechanics. I thought I was following the majority of it until I got to Sec. 3.3, in particular the derivation of the multiples of identity for the commutators of these generators.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example, the commutator of two rotations is given as

[tex][J_\alpha,J_\beta]=i\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}J_\gamma + i\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}b_\gamma I[/tex]

He then states that one can redefine the phase of certain vectors to transform the phase term to 0 and does so with the substitutions

[tex]J_\alpha + b_\alpha I \rightarrow J_\alpha[/tex]

leading to

[tex][J_\alpha,J_\beta]=i\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}J_\gamma[/tex]

I feel I am missing something key in what is going on here because I am not understanding why one can't just arbitrarily say the extra phase piece in the first equation is just 0 by setting [tex]b_\gamma = 0[/tex]. Where are these phase differences coming from that one needs to change your generator as Ballentine does?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Some confusion about Ballentine Sec 3.3 Generators of Gallilei Groups

Loading...

Similar Threads - confusion Ballentine Generators | Date |
---|---|

I Spin confusion: Stern-Gerlach experiment | Jan 22, 2018 |

I Confused about Dirac Notation | Jan 13, 2018 |

B Two Confusing Entanglement Scenarios | Dec 20, 2017 |

I Probability vs radial density-confusion | Oct 25, 2017 |

Ballentine's (3.49) and (3.50) | Jun 29, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**