Some said 1000's of experiments support superposition but

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception that particles can exist in two mutually exclusive states simultaneously, a claim purportedly supported by thousands of experiments. However, the consensus is that experimental results do not indicate superposition states; rather, they confirm that measured results correspond to unique eigenstates of observables. For finite discrete spectra, there are a maximum of n possible outcomes, contradicting the notion of infinite allowed outcomes in superposition. Understanding the distinction between observables and states, as well as the role of vector spaces in quantum mechanics, is crucial for grasping these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of eigenstates and observables
  • Knowledge of vector spaces in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with statistical operators in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development" by Ballentine for a comprehensive understanding of quantum measurement and state determination.
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of vector spaces and their application in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of statistical operators and their role in representing quantum states.
  • Investigate the implications of half-integer angular momenta in quantum theory, particularly in relation to spin-1/2 particles.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of quantum theory and the interpretation of superposition and measurement in quantum systems.

  • #31
Don't start again the collapse debate. My opinion is well-known: There's no justification of it, it's not needed, and it's contradicting fundamental properties of relativistic QFT. There's Born's rule, giving the physical meaning of the quantum state, and nothing else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vanhees71 said:
The answer is very simple and known since 1928,
... and answers the OP's initial question.
vanhees71 said:
I think this thread is overdue to be closed!
Agreed, the more as it seems we're steering towards another subject, which by the way has already dozens of threads that can be read.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K