Undergrad Some said 1000's of experiments support superposition but

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that particles can exist in two mutually exclusive states simultaneously, which contradicts experimental results indicating that measured outcomes do not reflect superposition states. It is emphasized that for observables with a finite discrete spectrum, there are a limited number of possible outcomes, and superposition does not imply simultaneous existence in multiple states. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector spaces and the distinction between states and observables in quantum mechanics. Participants argue that a state vector can be expressed in different bases, but this does not mean the particle is in multiple states at once. Overall, the claim that particles can be in superposition of mutually exclusive states is deemed incorrect and misleading.
  • #31
Don't start again the collapse debate. My opinion is well-known: There's no justification of it, it's not needed, and it's contradicting fundamental properties of relativistic QFT. There's Born's rule, giving the physical meaning of the quantum state, and nothing else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vanhees71 said:
The answer is very simple and known since 1928,
... and answers the OP's initial question.
vanhees71 said:
I think this thread is overdue to be closed!
Agreed, the more as it seems we're steering towards another subject, which by the way has already dozens of threads that can be read.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
12K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
79
Views
8K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K