Some said 1000's of experiments support superposition but

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
31 replies · 4K views
Don't start again the collapse debate. My opinion is well-known: There's no justification of it, it's not needed, and it's contradicting fundamental properties of relativistic QFT. There's Born's rule, giving the physical meaning of the quantum state, and nothing else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vanhees71 said:
The answer is very simple and known since 1928,
... and answers the OP's initial question.
vanhees71 said:
I think this thread is overdue to be closed!
Agreed, the more as it seems we're steering towards another subject, which by the way has already dozens of threads that can be read.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and vanhees71