Space crafts and anti gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter pete94857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anti-gravity Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights inconsistencies in science fiction portrayals of space travel, particularly regarding the effects of acceleration and sudden impacts on crew members. While engaging warp drive often shows minimal physical effects on the crew, unexpected forces, like weapons fire or gravitational waves, result in violent motion. This discrepancy diminishes the audience's immersion in the narrative. The evolution of special effects and audience expectations also influences how these scenarios are depicted, with newer versions of stories tending to incorporate more political themes. Ultimately, the conversation suggests that advancements in technology and storytelling techniques may lead to more realistic representations of space travel in the future.
pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
In ever space science friction involving a light speed or near light speed or even beyond when they engage warp drive or drop out of warp drive they persons on board hardly twitch yet if an aggressive ship fires upon them or some gravitational wave hit them suddenly they are all thrown all over the place and the ship starts falling apart. Kind of breaks the connection for me being able to indulge my imagination into it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pete94857 said:
In ever space science friction involving a light speed or near light speed or even beyond when they engage warp drive or drop out of warp drive they persons on board hardly twitch...
It has been a while since I saw Star Trek the Movie but if memory serves, things 'went crazy' on the bridge the first time they entered warp 1 exceeding speed of light. Visible light became hazy and rainbowed, the astrogator went bald and her voice lowered an octave, things bounced around during the transition. That was many Star Treks ago so I may be conflating plots.

Your point has merit. Consider two factors in your scenario. Technology advances giving writers and directors new tricks to play on our senses. For example, space ships in early SF movies appeared tiny. As cameras and photography improved, space ships appeared immense as the director could 'dolly' a camera along a scale model in place of suspending a small model by wires.

Cultural biases and interests evolve as audiences become used to warp drives or talking dragons, so take these for granted. Yet "everything old is new again" so the crew of the Enterprise gets blasted and thrown around the stage as if they were in a WWII tank battle. A creative writer deals with both aspects. Jaded audience expects new thrills even in sequels but wants familiarity at the same time.

SF auther Robert Heinlein famously noted that fans expect nothing new watching a baseball game yet baseball remains a popular American sport. I am amazed that production companies still crank out WWII movies after 80+ years, not unlike vampires rising from the grave in popular fantasy.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and pete94857
All very true I'm sure, I've never seen that episode of star trek but I.most definitely would want to watch it, sometimes on tv it's a toss of the coin between old and newer versions if they happen to be showing at the same time, seems like the older version was much more about the unknown some would say impossible scenarios but quantum physics says anything is possible, well maybe.

The newer versions tend to be more political unfortunately from my own perspective.
 
pete94857 said:
The newer versions tend to be more political unfortunately from my own perspective.
While PF prohibits political discussions, one expects an increase of politics in SF plots this decade. Afterall, Tolkien based much of LotR fantasy wars and devastation on WWII history as did George Orwell in his highly political novels "1984" and "Animal Farm".

Anti-gravity and free-fall (null gravity) seem as ubiquitous in SF as revolvers and shotguns stagecoaches in Westerns. Early SF movies and series sort of glossed over free-fall using wires, acting and special effects (FX) to simulate weightlessness. Ron Howard and other directors hired high flying cargo aircraft that could provide usuable minutes of free-fall in extended dives from altitude. Some "Apollo 13" footage looks nearly identical to actual weightlessness aboard the IST (International Space Station).

Gene Roddenberry followed a much less expensive path creating Star Trek. Stipulate some form of artificial gravity on all the space craft and film earthbound actors on a sound stage. SF movies and series do some things well but anti-gravity often seems haphazard. Once we have improved theories of quantum gravity in actual physics, expect better anti-grav representations in science fiction.

[edit 20241114: fixed typos. Replaced shotguns with stagecoaches.]
 
Last edited:
pete94857 said:
In ever space science friction involving a light speed or near light speed or even beyond when they engage warp drive or drop out of warp drive they persons on board hardly twitch yet if an aggressive ship fires upon them or some gravitational wave hit them suddenly they are all thrown all over the place and the ship starts falling apart. Kind of breaks the connection for me being able to indulge my imagination into it.

One handwavy explanation is that 'inertial dampeners' only work when they know ahead of time what's going to happen, such as when the ship is commanded to accelerate, but not when subject to rapid, unexpected accelerations from weapons impact and the like.
 
Drakkith said:
One handwavy explanation is that 'inertial dampeners' only work when they know ahead of time what's going to happen, such as when the ship is commanded to accelerate, but not when subject to rapid, unexpected accelerations from weapons impact and the like.
I suppose that could be the case 👍
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
512
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Back
Top