Space Elevator: Carbon Nanotubes, Lasers & Beamed Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and technical challenges of constructing a space elevator, focusing on the materials involved, particularly carbon nanotubes, and the methods of powering the lifters, such as lasers and beamed energy. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of the concept, including electrical conductivity, tensile strength, and potential engineering solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why carbon nanotubes, known for their conductivity, cannot be used to conduct electricity to the lifters.
  • Others suggest that the tether could potentially serve as a power source due to the large potential difference between Earth and space, although the actual power output remains uncertain.
  • One participant cites a proposal to use a second cable for power transmission, inspired by technology from bullet trains.
  • Contrarily, another participant argues that carbon nanotubes in bulk form are poor conductors and expresses skepticism about the viability of space tethers due to the extreme tensile forces involved.
  • Some participants acknowledge the engineering challenges but suggest that advancements in material science could eventually lead to a feasible solution for strong enough materials.
  • Questions arise regarding the specific strength required for a cable to reach geosynchronous orbit and whether current experimental values of carbon nanotubes meet this requirement.
  • There is mention of a significant amount of research and interest in the topic, with many scientists and engineers actively exploring the concept of space elevators.
  • One participant introduces the idea of using dampeners to address potential vibrations in the cable, suggesting a technical solution to a possible issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of skepticism and optimism regarding the feasibility of space elevators, with no consensus reached on the practicality of using carbon nanotubes or the overall concept of space tethers. Multiple competing views remain on the technical challenges and potential solutions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainties about the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotubes in bulk form, the specific strength required for the tether, and the unresolved nature of the engineering challenges associated with space elevators.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in advanced materials, aerospace engineering, and theoretical physics may find the discussion relevant and insightful.

danlgarmstron
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The tether generally proposed for a space elevator is usually made of carbon nanotubes. However, the lifters themselves are usually powered by lasers or some type of beamed energy.

Two questions:
1. Carbon nanotubes can be very good conductors, why can't they be used to conduct electricity to the lifters?

2. Could the tether itself be used as a power source given the vast potential difference between Earth(ground) and space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about your first question.
But as for your second one, there are a lot of papers out there on this topic. And it seems plausible if you had a long enough tether(which you obviously would), but I'm not sure how much power you'd actually receive out of the system.
 
Last edited:
" Equally, there is the issue of powering the carriages as they climb into space. “We are thinking of using the technology employed in our bullet trains,” Professor Aoki said. “Carbon nanotubes are good conductors of electricity, so we are thinking of having a second cable to provide power all along the route.” "

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article4799369.ece
 
Actually, carbon nanotubes in bulk form are piss-poor conductors of electricity. Nobody in their right mind would use them for transmission of electrical power.

Space tethers are simply a horrible idea. No material in existence can withstand the massive tensile forces that would be present in a space tether. It is pure science fiction.
 
Brian_C said:
Space tethers are simply a horrible idea. No material in existence can withstand the massive tensile forces that would be present in a space tether. It is pure science fiction.
That doesn't make them a horrible idea, it means we have a significant engineeering R&D hurdle to overcome. But projections based on current experiments indicate that we are heading in the right direction - that making a strong enough material is an achievable goal. And the potential payoff is spectacular.
 
I'm skeptical. Can the experimentally obtained values of carbon nonotubes actually do this? What is the minimum required specific strength (tensile strength divided by density) required to stretch a cable from ground level to geosynchronous orbit without a load?

Do you have a source for strength and weight values, or something?
 
Last edited:
Phrak said:
I'm skeptical. Can the experimentally obtained values of carbon nonotubes actually do this? What is the minimum required specific strength required to stretch a cable from ground level to geosynchronous orbit without a load?

Do you have a source for strength and weight values, or something?
It is an extremely hot topic. There are large ad hoc groups of scientists and engineers that are devoting some portions of their lives to exploring it - many people are personally very passionate about it. And there is a metric buttload of papers on this topic and anything space elevator-related.
 
QUOTE=DaveC426913;2495517]It is an extremely hot topic. There are large ad hoc groups of scientists and engineers that are devoting some portions of their lives to exploring it - many people are personally very passionate about it. And there is a metric buttload of papers on this topic and anything space elevator-related.[/QUOTE]

Thanks. In perusing about the internet, I've now seen that. Wikipedia claims that current specific strength of experimentally tested carbon nontubes is insufficient. The theoretical strength is far higher. But this was the case with boron fiber a few decades ago and nothing came of it. It could be interesting to see how this develops.
 
Phrak said:
QUOTE=DaveC426913;2495517] But this was the case with boron fiber a few decades ago and nothing came of it..

except the space shuttle landing gear

dr
 
  • #10
Addressing "Wobble"

Of course there willl be vibration in a Space Elevator cable. You can't have a long taught cable without it trying to behave like a guitar string.
Might I suggest dampeners at either end?
As soon as an oscillation starts to build, a 'de-oscillation' computer program instructs the rings holding the cable in place at both ends to shift in the direction of the oscillation, thus causing the cable's movement to dampen.
As with anything new and wonderful, there will be many obstacles - but that is what we hairless monkeys are so very, very good at overcoming.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K