Spacecraft altitude and orbit problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spacecraft and its satellite in orbit around the Earth, specifically focusing on the effects of the satellite's ejection on the spacecraft's altitude and speed. The spacecraft is initially at an altitude of 600 km, and the discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of linear momentum to determine the new speed of the spacecraft after the satellite is ejected. There are attempts to relate this to the spacecraft's altitude at different points in its orbit, particularly at phi = pi.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided equations related to angular momentum and orbital mechanics, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made regarding the spacecraft's initial conditions and the implications of using specific constants. There is ongoing exploration of how to calculate the new orbital parameters based on the ejection event.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in the constants used for gravitational calculations and the implications of different reference frames or models for the Earth's radius. There is also mention of the need to clarify the initial speed of the spacecraft before and after the satellite's ejection.

Alomonger Pete
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A spacecraft (with its cargo, a satellite) is circling the Earth at a
constant speed and an altitude of 600km. The combined mass of the craft and
the satellite is 1.20×10^5 kg (kilograms).

At phi = 0, the captain ejects the 1.10×10^4 kg satellite out the
back. The speed of the satellite relative to the spacecraft at the time of
separation is 100 m/s (meters per second).

When the spacecraft reaches phi = pi, what will its altitude above the
Earth be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my attempt at answering the above question:

Applying the Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum:

0 = -(1.10×10^4)×100 + (1.20×10^5)×V

Hence V = 9.167 m/s, where V is the relative speed of the spacecraft after
ejecting the satellite.

I assume that 'phi = 0' means that the spacecraft is currently at the
perigee of an elliptic orbit and I need to find its altitude when phi = pi
(at the apogee).

I believe I am meant to use some or all of the following equations:

r = l/(1 + e cos(phi))

l = L^2/GMm^2

e = AL^2/GMm^2

1/r = Acos(phi) + GMm/L^2

...where:

G = 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2kg^-2

M = 5.98×10^24 kg

radius of Earth: 6.37×10^6 m

However I have no idea what to do next. Please advise me. THANK YOU.
 
Well, you have an equation that says what the radial position is if you know the angular momentum. Conservation of momentum gives you the new orbital speed of the spacecraft .

So how do you find the new angular momentum of the spacecraft ?

-Dan
 
Alomonger Pete said:
Here is my attempt at answering the above question:

Applying the Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum:

0 = -(1.10×10^4)×100 + (1.20×10^5)×V

Hence V = 9.167 m/s, where V is the relative speed of the spacecraft after
ejecting the satellite.

I assume that 'phi = 0' means that the spacecraft is currently at the
perigee of an elliptic orbit and I need to find its altitude when phi = pi
(at the apogee).

I believe I am meant to use some or all of the following equations:

r = l/(1 + e cos(phi))

l = L^2/GMm^2

e = AL^2/GMm^2

1/r = Acos(phi) + GMm/L^2

...where:

G = 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2kg^-2

M = 5.98×10^24 kg

radius of Earth: 6.37×10^6 m

However I have no idea what to do next. Please advise me. THANK YOU.
You have a couple problems.

One, you calculated the difference in velocity between the initial speed of the spacecraft and final speed, but still don't know the speed of either.

Secondly, your second equation can be simplified by using the 'specific angular momentum per unit mass' (the mass is squared in both the numerator and denominator, canceling out). The easier equation is:

[tex]r = \frac{\frac {h^2}{\mu}}{1 + e cos \phi}[/tex]

[tex]\mu[/tex] is just the universal gravitational constant times the mass of the Earth (no sense multiplying two constants by each other over and over - in fact, the WGS-84 value for it is 3.986004418 x 10^14 m^3/sec^2).
Edit: Since you're using rounded numbers for G and M, your number won't match the WGS-84 value. In fact, with a radius of 6370 km, you're probably using a different datum than WGS-84. The WGS-84 radius is 6378.137 km.

I mention this only because the specific angular momentum is also equal to the cross product of the radius vector and the velocity vector - or, algebraically, the radius times the speed times the angle between the two vectors if the origins coinided. Since you started out in a circular orbit, the velocity is always perpendicular to the radius. That means you can use the specific angular momentum to determine your initial speed. Or, if you left the mass into get your real angular momentum, you could still find your linear momentum, and then divide by your mass (it's just easier to leave the mass out).

Once you have your initial speed, you could use conservation of linear momentum to determine the final speed (actually, since you already calculated how much the spacecraft sped up, you could just add that to your initial speed).

[tex](1.20*10^5)(v_i)=(1.1*10^4)(v_f-100) + (1.09*10^5)(v_f)[/tex]

From there, you should get a better start.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K