Spaceship Escape speed understanding

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the escape speed of a spaceship launched from the Earth's surface, focusing on the relationship between initial speed, gravitational potential energy, and kinetic energy as the spaceship moves away from Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of energy conservation principles, questioning the appropriate equations for kinetic and potential energy. They explore the implications of varying acceleration during the spaceship's ascent and consider the conditions under which the spaceship operates after launch.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into energy equations and questioning the definitions of kinetic and total mechanical energy. There is an ongoing exploration of how to derive the final speed from the total energy, with no consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note assumptions about the spaceship's propulsion and the conditions of its launch, including the idea that it drifts without significant thrust once it leaves the Earth's surface. There is also mention of potential issues with the problem's requirements or expectations from a computational perspective.

Patdon10
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spaceship is launched from the Earth's surface with a speed v. The radius of the Earth is R. What will its speed be when it is very far from the Earth? (Use any variable or symbol stated above along with the following as necessary: G for the gravitational constant, m for the mass of the spaceship, and M for the mass of the Earth.)

What is V_f?


2. The attempt at a solution

I'm really not sure what my teacher is looking for. I tried sqroot(2GM/R) to no avail. Any ideas?

I also know vf = vi + at. What could I substitute in for the acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Patdon10 said:
I also know vf = vi + at. What could I substitute in for the acceleration?
The vf - vi = at formula only works for uniform acceleration. But that doesn't apply here because the acceleration changes throughout the trip.

And by the way, I'm pretty sure you're supposed to assume that the spaceship was launched into space as if launched from a catapult. In other words, once it gets away from the Earth's surface, it drifts naturally without using any significant thrust or propulsion. Assume the ship uses up all of its propulsion/fuel/etc, when launching, immediately after which the spaceship has mass m and speed v.

Here are some questions to ask yourself.
  • What is the initial kinetic energy of the spaceship?
  • What is the gravitational potential of Earth (with respect to infinity)?
  • Knowing Earth's gravitational potential, what is the difference in gravitational potential energy between a spaceship of mass m on the surface of the Earth and infinity?
  • So after reaching an infinite distance from Earth (well, let's just say "a long way from Earth"), how much kinetic energy is left over?
 
The equation I'm getting is total energy = (1/2)mv^2 - G*(mM/R+h)

How could I solve for v final from having the total energy? h = infinity
 
Patdon10 said:
The equation I'm getting is total energy = (1/2)mv^2 - G*(mM/R)
'Looks good :approve: but just make sure you note that the v in the above equation is the initial speed, vi.
K.E.final = ½mvi2 - G(Mm/R)​
How could I solve for v final from having the total energy?
Ummm, :rolleyes: I'm sure you already know this,
K.E.final = ½mvf2
 
well, yeah. I know that final kinetic energy is equal to that. However, why is it kinetic energy? Isn't it total Mechanical energy?...

You know what, you're right. Isn't it only kinetic energy because the potential energy is 0 (it's very far away)?
 
I tried
Untitled1-1.png
Still telling me it's the wrong answer : /
 
Patdon10 said:
I tried
Untitled1-1.png



Still telling me it's the wrong answer : /
I don't see anything wrong with your answer. But the program might be expecting you to simplify a little more maybe. You could multiply the 2/m through the other terms, getting rid of the variable m in the process.
 
Alright. I'll give it a try. Thanks a lot for the speedy responses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K