Special Case of Compton Scattering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of Compton scattering, particularly focusing on a scenario where the incident photon has an energy equal to that of a stationary electron (512 keV). Participants explore theoretical implications, potential applications, and the behavior of electrons in various contexts related to Compton scattering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if there is anything special about Compton scattering when the incident photon energy matches the rest energy of the electron, proposing a relationship involving scattering angles and energies.
  • Another participant references the Klein-Nishina formula and suggests that the scenario does not present anything particularly unique.
  • Speculation arises about the potential use of a gamma ray laser for imaging purposes, with a participant noting existing research on Compton effect imaging.
  • A participant introduces a theoretical result indicating that if the scattered photon has energy equal to the electron's rest mass, the photon and electron trajectories are at right angles, raising questions about the plausibility of such scenarios.
  • Concerns are raised about the concept of "stopping" electrons and whether stationary free electrons can exist outside of atomic structures.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of "stopped" electrons, suggesting that there are reference frames where outgoing electrons can be at rest.
  • Discussion includes the feasibility of having free but stationary electrons and the implications of such a state on Compton scattering experiments.
  • Participants reference external sources discussing the possibility of stopping electrons with light, questioning the need for a gamma ray laser to explore these ideas.
  • The conversation touches on the behavior of electrons in motion and the implications of reference frames in the context of Compton scattering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the uniqueness of the scenario presented, the feasibility of stationary free electrons, and the implications of stopping electrons in various reference frames. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of creating a target of completely free electrons and the challenges associated with defining "stationary" in different contexts. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the behavior of electrons in various states and the implications for Compton scattering.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying advanced topics in quantum mechanics, particle physics, and experimental physics, particularly in the context of scattering phenomena and the behavior of electrons.

neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
724
TL;DR
Is there anything special about a Compton scattering event in which the incident photon has the same energy (512 keV) as the electron at rest ?
Was just wondering if there's anything special about the physics of Compton scattering where the incident photon has the same energy (512 keV) as the electron at rest. Then: $$1−cosθ_d=\frac{E_0ΔE}{Ei Er}=\frac{E_0(E_0−Er)}{E_0E_r}=\frac{E_0}{E_r}−1=\frac{λ_r}{λ_0}−1 $$ $$⇒\frac{1}{E_r}\propto -\cos\theta_d$$ $$⇒\lambda_r\propto -\cos\theta_d$$ where ##E_0## and ##\lambda_0## are the energy and (Compton) wavelength of the stationary electron and ##E_r##,##\lambda_r## are the energy and wavelength of the scattered photon.

Might be relevant if the gamma ray laser ever becomes a reality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose the gamma ray laser becomes a reality. Could it be used for imaging purposes and if so then wouldn't the simplified Compton scattering relationships prove useful ? Just speculating admittedly but Compton effect imaging is already 'real' science:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49130-z
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
There's a result which shows that if the scattered photon has energy equal to the rest mass of the electron, then the trajectories of the scattered photon and the electron are at right angles. Scattering angle is given by ##sin\theta=v/c## where v is the post collision velocity of the electron.

As I imagine it, the 'reverse time' version of this collision is an electron (beam of electrons perhaps) colliding with a gamma ray photon (beam of gamma rays) at right angles. The gamma ray photons have energy equal to rest mass of electrons. The electrons are "stopped" (if that is possible ??) and the gamma photons pick up the energy/momentum and are deflected through an angle ##\theta## where ##sin\theta## = v/c and v is the pre-collision velocity of the electron(s).

Does that sound plausible in 'real' time ? I can't quite imagine how a "stopped" electron would behave!
 
neilparker62 said:
The electrons are "stopped" (if that is possible ??)

Why is this a problem? For all scatters there is a frame where the outgoing electron is at rest.
 
Ok - so per scenario above, you fire beams of electrons and gamma ray photons (512 keV) at right angles to each other. What happens - does the electron 'beam' simply disappear ? One can imagine stationary electrons within the context of being bound to some atom but not suspended in mid air / mid vacuum as it were. Do they just fall to the ground under gravity or what ?

Alternatively if you want to carry out Compton scattering on 'free' rather than 'bound' electrons, is it possible to have 'free but stationary' electrons ? Stationary in the same way as bound electrons are 'stationary' ?
 
neilparker62 said:
What happens - does the electron 'beam' simply disappear ?

Why would it? If you see a beam of electrons moving past you at v=non-zero what is the problem with moving along the beam so v=0 relative to you?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why would it? If you see a beam of electrons moving past you at v=non-zero what is the problem with moving along the beam so v=0 relative to you?
In principle, no problem. Except that in the scenario described above the electrons are 'stopped' in the observer reference frame - he/she is not moving alongside the beam because the beam has been 'stopped' relative to him/her. The electrons are 'stationary' in a fashion identical to that of loosely bound electrons in an atom - the original target of Compton scattering experiments.

From: https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Modern_Physics/Book%3A_Spiral_Modern_Physics_(DAlessandris)/4%3A_The_Photon/4.2%3A_Compton_Scattering

Compton scattering refers to the scattering of light off of free electrons. Experimentally, it’s impossible to create a target of completely free electrons. However, if the incident photons have energy much greater than the typical binding energies of electrons to atoms, the electrons will be “knocked off” of the atoms by the photons and act as free particles. Therefore, Compton scattering typically refers to scattering of high energy photons off of atomic targets.
 
  • #10
Let's go step by step.

OK, so you don't have a problem with a stopped electron.
In a collision with billiard balls, do you have a problem with the final velocity of a billiard ball being zero?
What about a photon-billiard ball collision?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K