Special cases of the Schroedinger Eq?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ManDay
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of the Schrödinger Equation (SE) under specific conditions, particularly for time-invariant and constant potentials. The equation simplifies to \(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2} = 2\frac{m}{\hbar^2}(V(x)-E)\psi\) for time-invariant potentials. When the potential is both time and spatially invariant, it further simplifies to \(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2} = -k^2\psi\). The confusion arises regarding the implications of non-constant potentials, as they introduce position-dependent kinetic energy, contradicting the simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger Equation (SE)
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts
  • Basic grasp of kinetic energy in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time-invariant potentials in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of spatial invariance in the Schrödinger Equation
  • Explore the concept of kinetic energy in quantum systems
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as perturbation theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing potential energy scenarios, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the Schrödinger Equation's applications.

ManDay
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
According to the lecture I'm hearing the SE can be simplified for the cases of a timeinvariant potential and a constant potential:

Time invariant

[itex]\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2} = 2\frac m{\hbar^2}(V(x)-E)\psi[/itex].

Then, the lecture states that for the case of the potential being not just time but also spatially invariant it can be simplified to

[itex]\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2} = -k^2\psi[/itex]

My question is, why this is said to be possible, only if the potential is constant. Given the term [itex]V(x) - E[/itex] we can conclude that [itex]V(x) - E = E_{kin}[/itex] and hence [itex]\frac12\hbar^2\frac{k^2}m[/itex]

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the potential is non-constant then the kinetic energy V-E is once again a function of position. Your last result is not a function of position.
 
Call it k(x) Then it is a function of position.

nvm replying, I got the "idea" and I've to blame it on the lecture that this wasn't clear.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K