A Special & General Relativity: CTC Metrics in Cylindrical Coordinates

YRC
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am studying metrics that exhibit CTCs. I was looking at a few different metrics...
Tipler's solution
Godel metric
Kerr metric
For starters to compare them, I am trying to convert said metrics into cylindrical coordinates. Thanks in advance for any help😃
 
Physics news on Phys.org
YRC said:
I am trying to convert said metrics into cylindrical coordinates.
What have you found in sources that you have looked at? For the last two, at any rate, it should be easy to find expressions for the metrics in cylindrical coordinates.
 
PeterDonis said:
What have you found in sources that you have looked at? For the last two, at any rate, it should be easy to find expressions for the metrics in cylindrical coordinates.
I understand that the coordinate transform for the Godel metric would look like this, ##x^{\alpha}=(t, x, y, z)=(t, r\cos{\phi}, r\sin{\phi}, z)## for cartesian and cylindrical coordinates. The cylindrical metric itself is given by ##g_{t,t}=c^2##,##g_{r,r}=1/(1+(r/2a)^2)##, ##g_{\phi,\phi}= -r^2(1-(r/2a)^2)##, ##g_{z,z}=-1## and ##g_{t,\phi}=r^2*c/(\sqrt{2}a), g_{\phi,t}=r^2*c/(\sqrt{2}a)## right? That's what I found for Godel, For the Tipler cylinder I found it in cylindrical coordinates... ds^2 = H(dr^2+ dz^2 ) + LdĻ•^2 + 2MdĻ•dt āˆ’ Fdt^2 , What about the Kerr metric that is commonly expressed in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates?

Mentors' note: The Latex was posted without the required delimiters. We've edited in the delimiters but have not otherwise cleaned up the formatting. OP, would you please finish this cleanup?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
YRC said:
I am studying metrics that exhibit CTCs.
I don't know if this helps, but any (locally Minkowski) metric can exhibit CTC. For example the flat metric
$$ds^2=dt^2-dx^2$$
contains CTC's if we interpret it as a spacetime with cylindrical topology in which ##t## and ##t+2\pi## are identified. The point is that cylinder admits a flat metric, so when we say that the metric is flat, we have not excluded a possibility that it is a cylinder.

EDIT: It's not valid for any metric, but it's valid for any metric with timelike Killing vector.
 
Last edited:
Demystifier said:
I don't know if this helps, but any (locally Minkowski) metric can exhibit CTC. For example the flat metric
$$ds^2=dt^2-dx^2$$
contains CTC's if we interpret it as a spacetime with cylindrical topology in which ##t## and ##t+2\pi## are identified. The point is that cylinder admits a flat metric, so when we say that the metric is flat, we have not excluded a possibility that it is a cylinder.
Yes thanks, the Tipler cylinder metric does reduce to the Minkowski line element in cylindrical coordinates when the angular velocity is 0. I was wondering about using the Kerr metric to describe the exterior of the rotating Tipler cylinder. How would that work? Would that work? In a configuration where we have a metric describing the negative energy density required, and this exterior, would CTCs arise in a confined region bounded by the cylinder?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal ā€œrest frameā€ (like the old idea of the ā€œetherā€)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top