A Special & General Relativity: CTC Metrics in Cylindrical Coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the study of metrics exhibiting closed timelike curves (CTCs), specifically comparing Tipler's, Godel's, and Kerr metrics. Participants are exploring the conversion of these metrics into cylindrical coordinates, with specific expressions provided for Godel and Tipler metrics. There is a suggestion that any locally Minkowski metric can exhibit CTCs under certain conditions, particularly in cylindrical topology. The conversation also touches on the potential use of the Kerr metric to describe the exterior of a rotating Tipler cylinder and the implications for CTCs in that context. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical transformations and theoretical implications of these metrics in relation to CTCs.
YRC
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am studying metrics that exhibit CTCs. I was looking at a few different metrics...
Tipler's solution
Godel metric
Kerr metric
For starters to compare them, I am trying to convert said metrics into cylindrical coordinates. Thanks in advance for any help😃
 
Physics news on Phys.org
YRC said:
I am trying to convert said metrics into cylindrical coordinates.
What have you found in sources that you have looked at? For the last two, at any rate, it should be easy to find expressions for the metrics in cylindrical coordinates.
 
PeterDonis said:
What have you found in sources that you have looked at? For the last two, at any rate, it should be easy to find expressions for the metrics in cylindrical coordinates.
I understand that the coordinate transform for the Godel metric would look like this, ##x^{\alpha}=(t, x, y, z)=(t, r\cos{\phi}, r\sin{\phi}, z)## for cartesian and cylindrical coordinates. The cylindrical metric itself is given by ##g_{t,t}=c^2##,##g_{r,r}=1/(1+(r/2a)^2)##, ##g_{\phi,\phi}= -r^2(1-(r/2a)^2)##, ##g_{z,z}=-1## and ##g_{t,\phi}=r^2*c/(\sqrt{2}a), g_{\phi,t}=r^2*c/(\sqrt{2}a)## right? That's what I found for Godel, For the Tipler cylinder I found it in cylindrical coordinates... ds^2 = H(dr^2+ dz^2 ) + Ldϕ^2 + 2Mdϕdt − Fdt^2 , What about the Kerr metric that is commonly expressed in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates?

Mentors' note: The Latex was posted without the required delimiters. We've edited in the delimiters but have not otherwise cleaned up the formatting. OP, would you please finish this cleanup?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
YRC said:
I am studying metrics that exhibit CTCs.
I don't know if this helps, but any (locally Minkowski) metric can exhibit CTC. For example the flat metric
$$ds^2=dt^2-dx^2$$
contains CTC's if we interpret it as a spacetime with cylindrical topology in which ##t## and ##t+2\pi## are identified. The point is that cylinder admits a flat metric, so when we say that the metric is flat, we have not excluded a possibility that it is a cylinder.

EDIT: It's not valid for any metric, but it's valid for any metric with timelike Killing vector.
 
Last edited:
Demystifier said:
I don't know if this helps, but any (locally Minkowski) metric can exhibit CTC. For example the flat metric
$$ds^2=dt^2-dx^2$$
contains CTC's if we interpret it as a spacetime with cylindrical topology in which ##t## and ##t+2\pi## are identified. The point is that cylinder admits a flat metric, so when we say that the metric is flat, we have not excluded a possibility that it is a cylinder.
Yes thanks, the Tipler cylinder metric does reduce to the Minkowski line element in cylindrical coordinates when the angular velocity is 0. I was wondering about using the Kerr metric to describe the exterior of the rotating Tipler cylinder. How would that work? Would that work? In a configuration where we have a metric describing the negative energy density required, and this exterior, would CTCs arise in a confined region bounded by the cylinder?
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...