Can Science Fiction Inspire Real Astrophysical Discoveries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the plausibility of various science fiction concepts in astrophysics, including dense asteroid storms, habitable storm planets, and the dynamics of three-star systems like those depicted in "The Three Body Problem." Participants assert that while dense asteroid storms could occur post-collision, their longevity is questionable. The feasibility of planets like Tatooine maintaining stable orbits around binary stars is debated, alongside the potential for floating rocks in dense atmospheres. The conversation also touches on the catastrophic destruction of habitable worlds, emphasizing the reality of sudden cosmic events.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics, particularly in binary star systems.
  • Knowledge of planetary formation and the dynamics of asteroid collisions.
  • Familiarity with buoyancy principles and gas densities, particularly Tungsten hexafluoride.
  • Awareness of cosmic catastrophes and their implications for planetary habitability.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stability of circumbinary planets and their orbital mechanics.
  • Explore the effects of tidal forces on moons of gas giants and their potential for habitability.
  • Investigate the properties of supercritical fluids and their implications for atmospheric density.
  • Study the historical impact of cosmic events on Earth's biodiversity and planetary evolution.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, science fiction writers, and educators interested in the intersection of speculative fiction and real astrophysical phenomena.

GTOM
Messages
982
Reaction score
68
In Sf, we can regularly see planets and other places that are very different from what we see on Earth, or even in the solar system.

How plausible are the following ones?

- Dense asteroid storm. Maybe a new planet is forming, or a giant comet recently shattered? Can such thing exist in a Lagrange point for prolonged time?

- Tatooine. Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

- Three stars system like in Three Body Problem. As far as i know, real Alpha Centaury isn't like that since the third star is very distant. Does the real planet (planets?) have a very chaotic orbit?

- (habitable) Storm planet. Maybe it is a moon of a giant planet, and tidal forces regularly create very strong winds, inhabitants has to burrow underground structures?

- Floating rocks. Real rocks exist that float on water due to lots of gas bubbles. Could they float in very dense atmosphere?

- Once habitable world destroyed by a cosmic catastrophe in a relatively short time? (Not in millions of years)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumbinary_planet

GTOM said:
Storm planet

Neptune.

GTOM said:
Three stars system like in Three Body Problem.

The three body problem doesn't say these orbits are impossible. It says they are impossible to calculate using present analytic techniques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM
Check the writings of Phillip Jose Farmer. He invented several bizarre planets and made them entertaining.
 
GTOM said:
In Sf, we can regularly see planets and other places that are very different from what we see on Earth, or even in the solar system.

How plausible are the following ones?

- Dense asteroid storm. Maybe a new planet is forming, or a giant comet recently shattered? Can such thing exist in a Lagrange point for prolonged time?

- Tatooine. Can theoritecally a planet have a relatively stabile, not very eccentric orbit around binary stars?

- Three stars system like in Three Body Problem. As far as i know, real Alpha Centaury isn't like that since the third star is very distant. Does the real planet (planets?) have a very chaotic orbit?

- (habitable) Storm planet. Maybe it is a moon of a giant planet, and tidal forces regularly create very strong winds, inhabitants has to burrow underground structures?

- Floating rocks. Real rocks exist that float on water due to lots of gas bubbles. Could they float in very dense atmosphere?

- Once habitable world destroyed by a cosmic catastrophe in a relatively short time? (Not in millions of years)

Asteroid storm: I would say its possible in the short term, say after a collision of larger bodies, but the density of mass would diffuse into the vacuum of space, I have no idea what the time frames would be.

Habitable storm planet: I think an advanced civilization realizing their planet is about to turn into a storm planet might be able to build underground to evade, but I don't know if it would work if it always had destructive storms, I guess depends on how bad. But the life on this planet would have had to survive without technology in the early stage of evolution on that planet, I think this is less likely as single cell organisms (ie the start of life here) would be a bit more vulnerable to destruction. Basically a chicken and the egg argument, if you need to build underground to survive, how did you evolve to be able to do that in the first place?

Floating rocks: Buoyancy is simply a ratio of densities (as long as there is some acceleration acting on them), if you have a gas dense enough rocks will float. The highest density gas we have (according to google at room temp and 1atm) is Tungsten hexaflouride, this has a density of 12.4g/l, or 0.0124g/cc, but this is still one order of magnitude lower density than water ice (~0.92g/cc). So the atmosphere would have to be much higher pressure to increase the density. I do not know if there are chemicals that have a gaseous phase under pressure that is denser than any sold materials. For example the density of the atmosphere on the surface of venus (92x pressure on earth) is about 6.5% of water. Apparently on venus the pressure is high enough at the surface that CO2 is technically not a gas any more but a super critical fluid.

Once habitable world destroyed by cosmic event in short time:
Not sure what you mean by cosmic catastrophe (the thought experiment? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_catastrophe) , but I would say sudden death by space rock is very real, the dinos were wiped out by one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM
essenmein said:
Asteroid storm: I would say its possible in the short term, say after a collision of larger bodies, but the density of mass would diffuse into the vacuum of space, I have no idea what the time frames would be.

Habitable storm planet: I think an advanced civilization realizing their planet is about to turn into a storm planet might be able to build underground to evade, but I don't know if it would work if it always had destructive storms, I guess depends on how bad. But the life on this planet would have had to survive without technology in the early stage of evolution on that planet, I think this is less likely as single cell organisms (ie the start of life here) would be a bit more vulnerable to destruction. Basically a chicken and the egg argument, if you need to build underground to survive, how did you evolve to be able to do that in the first place?

Floating rocks: Buoyancy is simply a ratio of densities (as long as there is some acceleration acting on them), if you have a gas dense enough rocks will float. The highest density gas we have (according to google at room temp and 1atm) is Tungsten hexaflouride, this has a density of 12.4g/l, or 0.0124g/cc, but this is still one order of magnitude lower density than water ice (~0.92g/cc). So the atmosphere would have to be much higher pressure to increase the density. I do not know if there are chemicals that have a gaseous phase under pressure that is denser than any sold materials. For example the density of the atmosphere on the surface of venus (92x pressure on earth) is about 6.5% of water. Apparently on venus the pressure is high enough at the surface that CO2 is technically not a gas any more but a super critical fluid.

Once habitable world destroyed by cosmic event in short time:
Not sure what you mean by cosmic catastrophe (the thought experiment? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_catastrophe) , but I would say sudden death by space rock is very real, the dinos were wiped out by one.
Asteroid hit isn't bad, but i thought about something even worse that can't be stopped by a civilization that can build generation ships.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
6K