(special relativity)Trajectory under constant ordinary force

  • Thread starter Thread starter hoyung711
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Force
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
hoyung711
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle is subject to a constant force F on +x direction. At t = 0, it is located at origin with velocity vo in +y direction.

Homework Equations



Determine the trajectory of the particle. x(t),y(t),z(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\vec{p}= \int \vec{F} dt[/tex]
[tex]\vec{p} = \vec{F}t + constant[/tex]

At t=0
[tex]\vec{p} = \gamma mv_{o}[/tex]
[tex]\vec{p} = Ft\hat{x} + \gamma mv_{o}\hat{y}[/tex]

what should I do next? should I integral over [tex]p_{x}[/tex] and [tex]p_{y}[/tex] separately? Is that so, what are the exact steps?

I tried using
[tex]p_{x} = \frac{mu_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}}{c^{2}}}} = Ft[/tex]
[tex]x(t) = \frac{mc^{2}}{F} (\sqrt{1+\frac{Ft}{mc}^{2}} -1)[/tex]

what about y(t)? it seems it is a linear with t. I don't know where I get wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hoyung711 said:
I tried using
[tex]p_{x} = \frac{mu_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}}{c^{2}}}} = Ft[/tex]

[itex]\gamma[/itex] involves [itex]u^2[/itex], not just the x-component of the velocity:wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
[itex]\gamma[/itex] involves [itex]u^2[/itex], not just the x-component of the velocity:wink:

Do you mean I have to use
[tex]\frac{mu_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}+u^{2}_{y}}{c^{2}}}} = Ft[/tex]
[tex]\frac{mu_{y}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^{2}_{x}+u^{2}_{y}}{c^{2}}}} = \gamma mu_{o}[/tex]

and solve these coupling equations?
 
Last edited:
Do I have another way, because there will be messy if I solve the coupling and then take the integral.
Would Lorentz's transform help me to simplify the process?
 
Using L.T. s.t. [tex]\bar{S}[/tex] is moving in y-direction with [tex]u_{o}[/tex]

[tex]\bar{F_{x}}=\gamma F[/tex]
[tex]\bar{F_{y}}=0[/tex]
[tex]\bar{F_{z}}=0[/tex]

[tex]\bar{u_{x}}=0[/tex]
[tex]\bar{u_{y}}=0[/tex]
[tex]\bar{u_{z}}=0[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
I think my L.T. transform got some problems since the answer is too simple..
Can anyone give a hand?
 
I just sketch the method I used.
First use
[tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{x}}{dt}=F_{x}=F[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{y}}{dt}=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d\gamma mu_{z}}{dt}=0[/tex]

Then shows z is always zero
Hence the [tex]u^{2}[/tex] in the [tex]\gamma[/tex] becomes [tex]u_{x}^{2}+u_{y}^{2}[/tex]

Afterwards, integrated out [tex]u_{x}[/tex] and [tex]u_{y}[/tex]
decouple the equation s.t. one involves only [tex]u_{x}[/tex] and other [tex]u_{y}[/tex]
integrate it again, you will get the answer
 
Last edited: