MHB Spectral decomposition of compact operators

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the spectral decomposition of compact operators on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, specifically addressing the theorem involving the representation of compact operator T. It confirms that the sequence of eigenvectors (y_n) corresponds fully to the eigenvectors of the operator TT*. The conversation highlights that compact operators lack a direct sum decomposition, which contributes to the perceived unsatisfactoriness of their spectral decomposition compared to that of compact normal operators. In contrast, normal operators do allow for a direct sum decomposition, making their spectral properties more straightforward. The distinction between the two types of operators is crucial for understanding their spectral behavior.
Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let T be a compact operator on an infinite dimensional hilbert space H. I am proving the theorem which says that $Tx=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\lambda}_{n}\langle x,x_{n}\rangle y_{n}$ where ($x_{n}$) is an orthonormal sequence consisting of the eigenvectors of $|T|=(T^*T)^{0.5}$,
(${\lambda}_{n}$) is the corresponding sequence of eigenvalues, and ($y_{n}$) is an orthonormal sequence of, each $y_{n}$ is an eigenvector of $TT^*$.

I have two questions. Is ($y_{n}$) the full sequence of eigenvectors of $TT^*$? I would have thought the answer was yes because the square root of an operator has the same eigenvectors as the operator and an operator has the same 'number' of eigenvectors as it's adjoint.

Secondly, what makes this decomposition so unsatisfying compared to the decomposition of compact normal operators? Is it simply that we can't decompose the space into a direct sum?

Thanks

Note: this is a duplicate from math stack exchange which has gone unanswered for about a week.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the sequence ($y_{n}$) is the full sequence of eigenvectors of $TT^∗$. In general, if $T$ is a compact operator then it does not have a decomposition into a direct sum. This is what makes the decomposition of a compact operator unsatisfying compared to the decomposition of compact normal operators. The difference between the two is that a normal operator has a decomposition into a direct sum, while a compact operator does not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K