Spectral Zeta function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zeta function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Spectral Zeta function related to the Schrödinger operator, denoted as H, where the identity involving the eigenvalues E_n is established. The identity states that the sum of the eigenvalues raised to the power of -s is equal to a specific integral involving the trace of the operator e^{-tH}. The challenge presented is the need to determine the eigenvalues or the determinant of the Schrödinger operator to define the trace. It is confirmed that the operator can be diagonalized due to its Hermitian nature, ensuring real eigenvalues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of trace in linear algebra
  • Basic comprehension of the Gamma function and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the diagonalization process of Hermitian operators
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Trace operator
  • Learn about the Gamma function and its role in mathematical physics
  • Investigate the implications of the Spectral Zeta function in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students in quantum mechanics or mathematical physics who are interested in the properties of Schrödinger operators and the applications of the Spectral Zeta function.

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
Let be H an Schrodinguer operator so [tex]H \phi =E_n \phi[/tex]

then we have the identity

[tex]\sum_ {n} E_{n}^{-s} = \frac{1}{\Gamma (s)} \int_{0}^{\infty} dt t^{s-1} Tr[e^{-tH}][/tex]

the problem is , that to define the Trace of an operator i should know the Eigenvalues or the Determinant of the Schrodinguer operator, anyone can help ? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The assumption is that you can diagonalize it. Being Hermitian, it has real eigenvalues. The similarity transformation that makes it diagonal gets killed by the trace, so you can just pretend [tex]H = \operatorname{diag}(E_1, E_2, ..., E_n)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K