Speed of a particle inside an event horizon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a particle that has fallen inside the event horizon of a black hole, particularly focusing on its radial velocity and the implications of different coordinate systems. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and conceptual challenges related to velocities in the context of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a particle inside the event horizon must have a minimum radial velocity scaling as \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}\), raising the question of whether this implies speeds surpassing the speed of light as it approaches the singularity.
  • Another participant counters that the use of a non-local coordinate system leads to misleading interpretations, asserting that to a local observer, particles will always have velocities less than c.
  • A participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the implications of the coordinate systems, noting that the variable r represents distorted distance outside the event horizon but distorted time inside it.
  • There is a query about defining "proper velocity" inside the event horizon and its relation to standard Schwarzschild coordinates.
  • A later post introduces an equation for the radial proper velocity of a zero angular momentum observer, indicating that for a static black hole, proper velocity equals c at the event horizon, while for a rotating black hole, it appears to exceed c outside both the outer event horizon and the ergosphere.
  • Another participant reiterates the confusion regarding the interpretation of variables representing distance and time, suggesting a deeper relationship between space and time that remains poorly understood.
  • Equations from a referenced text are presented, detailing the time and velocity of an object falling from rest at infinity, emphasizing the relativity of distance inside a black hole based on the crossing speed of the event horizon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of velocities inside the event horizon, with some asserting that local observers measure velocities less than c, while others question the implications of coordinate systems. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of using non-local coordinate systems and the challenges in visualizing the relationship between distance and time inside a black hole. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the definitions of proper velocity and the implications of various equations.

La Guinee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Consider a particle that has fallen inside the event horizon of a black hole. You can show that
it must have a minimum radial velocity that scales as [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}[/tex] for small r. Where, by radial velocity I mean [tex]\frac{dr}{d \tau}[/tex] and tau is the proper time. Doesn't this mean that as the particle approaches the singularity its speed surpasses c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Only because you're using a weird, non-local system of coordinates. To any local observer, particles will have velocities less than c.

In other words, you're using proper time, but co-ordinate radius. Inside the black hole, one meter of coordinate radius has basically no relationship with an actual meter as measured by a meter stick by a local observer.
 
I see, thanks.
 
The variable r represents distorted distance outside the event horizon, but inside the event horizon it represents distorted time. Similarly, the variable t represents distorted time outside the event horizon, but inside the event horizon it represents distorted distance.

I find it hard to mentally picture what that really means, but the maths is clear on this point.
 
Is there a way to reasonably define "proper velocity" inside the event horizon? What would be the relation between this coordinate system and the standard Schwarzschild coordinates?
 
This is an old thread but I recently found an equation specifically referred to as the 'radial proper velocity of a zero angular momentum observer dropped from infinity' in relation to rotating black holes-

[tex] v=-\frac{\sqrt{2Mr(r^2+a^2)}}{r^2+a^2cos^2\theta}\ c[/tex]

where

a=J/mc

M=Gm/c^2

and θ is the angle between the zenith and the radial line.

The entire equation reduces to [itex]v=c\sqrt{r_s/r}[/itex] for a static black [itex](r_s=2M)[/itex]. Interestingly, while proper velocity equals c at the event horizon for a static black hole (relative to infinity), for a rotating black hole, radial proper velocity seems to exceed c not just outside the outer event horizon but outside the ergosphere also.

source-
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0805/0805.0206v1.pdf page 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The variable r represents distorted distance outside the event horizon, but inside the event horizon it represents distorted time. Similarly, the variable t represents distorted time outside the event horizon, but inside the event horizon it represents distorted distance

I find it hard to mentally picture what that really means, but the maths is clear on this point.

Boy am I glad to see someone else say that! I've read that interpretation several places and it still boggles my mind!

But it convinces me even more that space and time have underlying origins and fundamental relationships we do not understand.
 
A couple of equations regarding velocity from 'Exploring Black Holes' by Taylor & Wheeler (chapter 3: Plunging, project B: Inside the Black Hole) based on static black holes-

Rain frame (object dropped from rest at infinity) time between given radii-

[tex]\tau_{2\ rain} - \tau_{1\ rain}\ =\ \frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2}{M}}\left(r_1^{3/2} - r_2^{3/2}\right)[/tex]

where

[itex]M=Gm/c^2[/itex]

Divide the answer by c to get time, multiply by c (over 1m increments) to get velocity. Unity (i.e. 1) at EH. When you put in the Schwarzschild radius for [itex]\tau_{2\ rain}[/itex] and zero for [itex]\tau_{1\ rain}[/itex], you basically get the horizon to crunch distance for an object falling radially from rest at infinity-

[tex]\tau_{rain}(2M \rightarrow 0)=\frac{4}{3}M[/tex]

divide by c to get the horizon to crunch time for an object falling radially from rest at infinity.velocity of a free-falling object as clocked by the shell observer (r>2M)-

[tex]v_{shell}=\frac{dr_{shell}}{dt_{shell}}=-\sqrt{\frac{2M}{r}}[/tex]

(minus square root because the expression describes a decreasing radius as the object falls toward the black hole outside the horizon)proper velocity (can apply to r<2M)-

[tex]\frac{dr}{d\tau_{rain}}=-\sqrt{\frac{2M}{r}}[/tex]velocity as viewed from infinity (v=0 at event horizon)-

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}=-\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\sqrt{\frac{2M}{r}}[/tex]Horizon to crunch distance for an object falling radially from rest at the event horizon (drip frame)-

[tex]\tau_{max}(2M \rightarrow 0)=\pi M[/tex]

divide by c to get the horizon to crunch time for an object falling radially from rest at the event horizon.

It appears the whole concept of distance inside a black hole is relative to how fast you cross the event horizon.Draft copy of second edition of EBH-
http://www.eftaylor.com/comments/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K