Speed of car related to momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 1000 kg car with four passengers, each weighing 75 kg, at rest. The passengers jump off the car at a speed of 2 m/s relative to the car, and the participants are tasked with determining the speed of the car under two scenarios: when the passengers jump off simultaneously and when they jump off one by one.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of conservation of momentum to determine the car's speed after the passengers jump off. They discuss the implications of using different reference frames, questioning whether to use the car or the ground as a reference point.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and reasoning, with some expressing uncertainty about their results. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to the problem, particularly regarding the reference frame and the sequential nature of the jumps. Some participants have acknowledged mistakes and are considering adjustments to their calculations based on the concept of relative velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the reference frame in the context of the problem, as well as the subtleties involved in calculating the car's speed when passengers jump off simultaneously versus one by one. There is mention of the need to amend calculations based on these considerations.

songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395

Homework Statement


A 1000 kg car with 4 people on it, each 75 kg, is at rest. The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car. Find the speed of the car if the people jump off :

a. simultaneously
b. one by one

Homework Equations


conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



a.
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 300 * 2 - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.6 ms-1b.
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 156/1127 ms-1

(iii) when person 3 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 156/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 7230/48461 ms-1

(iv) when person 4 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 7230/48461) - 1000*v2

v2 = 0.161 ms-1

I calculated this with respect to the car. Do I get it right? For this kind of question, what should be taken as the reference, the car or the ground?

ThanksEDIT : I just realized my mistake. The reference should be ground and when person 2, 3 and 4 jump off one by one, there should be initial momentum relative to the ground. I'll amend my calculation in the next post
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a. the answer is still the same

b. assume the car moves to the left and the person jumps off to the right
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
-(75 * 6/49) - 1225 * 6/49 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 312/1127 ms-1

(iii)when person 3 jumps off :
- 75*312/1127 - 1150 * 312/1127 = 75*(2 + 312/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 0.474 ms-1

(iv)when person 4 jumps off :
- 75 * 0.474 - 1075 * 0.474 = 75 * (2 + 0.474) - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.73 ms-1

So the final speed of the car = 0.73 ms-1

Do I get it right? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Sorry fo bumping...

Can someone please check my work? Thanks :smile:
 
songoku said:
b. assume the car moves to the left and the person jumps off to the right
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

I agree with this part. Here's my picture (jumping off to the left):
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9197/mv1.jpg




(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
-(75 * 6/49) - 1225 * 6/49 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 312/1127 ms-1

(iii)when person 3 jumps off :
- 75*312/1127 - 1150 * 312/1127 = 75*(2 + 312/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 0.474 ms-1

(iv)when person 4 jumps off :
- 75 * 0.474 - 1075 * 0.474 = 75 * (2 + 0.474) - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.73 ms-1

So the final speed of the car = 0.73 ms-1

Do I get it right? Thanks

I don't agree with these. My picture, for part (ii) is,
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/6475/mv2q.jpg

when I use a frame at rest, although, it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get [itex]\rm V_1[/itex], then a frame moving at [itex]\rm V_1[/itex] to get [itex]\rm V_2[/itex],...etc.

The jumpers each give [itex]\rm \frac{mv}{3m+M}[/itex], [itex]\rm \frac{mv}{2m+M}[/itex], [itex]\rm \frac{mv}{m+M}[/itex], and [itex]\rm \frac{mv}{M}[/itex] respectiviely, which can be summed to find the final speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi dr_k

So for the case when person 2 jumps off, the equation should be (based on your picture):

(3*75 + 1000) * 6/49 = - (2 - 6/49) * 75 + 1150 * V2 ??


And I don't understand about this part "it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get V1 , then a frame moving at V1 to get V2, ... etc"

Can you please explain more? Thanks
 
songoku said:
Hi dr_k

So for the case when person 2 jumps off, the equation should be (based on your picture):

(3*75 + 1000) * 6/49 = - (2 - 6/49) * 75 + 1150 * V2 ??

Yep. Drawing the picture is 1/2 the problem.

And I don't understand about this part "it would be easier to make a new inertial frame for each jump, that moves at the constant speed of the previous jump. Basically, you can use a frame at rest to get V1 , then a frame moving at V1 to get V2, ... etc"

Can you please explain more? Thanks

Well, solving for [itex]\rm V_2[/itex], in the second picture, gives [itex]\rm V_2 = V_1 + \frac{m v}{2 m + M}[/itex], where [itex]\rm V_1 = \frac{m v}{3 m + M}[/itex]. Basically the objects in the the (i) initial and (f) final picture are all traveling at [itex]\rm V_1[/itex]. Instead of carrying these terms, you could just make an inertial frame moving at constant speed [itex]\rm V_1[/itex], and then remember to sum up the speed of the frames at the end. For example, the second picture above now looks like

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/4534/frames1.jpg

This frame says [itex]\rm V' = \frac{m v}{2 m + M}[/itex]. To get the speed for an observer at rest, just add [itex]\rm V_1 + V'[/itex] . Now do this as many times as required to get all four masses off.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi dr_k

Maybe I get your point. I'll try it first. Thanks a lot ! :smile:
 
songoku said:

Homework Statement


A 1000 kg car with 4 people on it, each 75 kg, is at rest. The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car. Find the speed of the car if the people jump off :

a. simultaneously
b. one by one


Homework Equations


conservation of momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



a.
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 300 * 2 - 1000 * v2

v2 = 0.6 ms-1


b.
(i) when person 1 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * 2 - 1225 * v2

v2 = 6/49 ms-1

(ii) when person 2 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 6/49) - 1150 * v2

v2 = 156/1127 ms-1

(iii) when person 3 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 156/1127) - 1075 * v2

v2 = 7230/48461 ms-1

(iv) when person 4 jumps off :
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1V1 + m2V2

0 = 75 * (2 + 7230/48461) - 1000*v2

v2 = 0.161 ms-1

I calculated this with respect to the car. Do I get it right? For this kind of question, what should be taken as the reference, the car or the ground?

Thanks


EDIT : I just realized my mistake. The reference should be ground and when person 2, 3 and 4 jump off one by one, there should be initial momentum relative to the ground. I'll amend my calculation in the next post

Good Morning Songoku,

I was just looking at this problem, and I noticed that I didn't read the problem carefully enough. There is a subtle point that I neglected. The problem states "The people jump off the car with speed 2 ms-1 relative to the car". Relative to the car implies that I missed something. In part "(a) a. simultaneously", the picture should look like this:

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/4534/frames1.jpg

This picture correctly shows both 4m and M moving with [itex]\rm V_1[/itex], and therefore v is "relative" to the car.

This implies

[itex]\rm 0 = M V_1 - 4m (v-V_1)[/itex]

so

[itex]\rm V_1 = \frac{4mv}{M+4m}[/itex] .

Putting the numbers in gives [itex]\rm V_1 = .4615 m/s[/itex] for part (a).

Give me a few minutes, and I'll write something up for part (b).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For part (b):

http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7726/frames2.jpg

Here v is "relative" to the car, and we get

[itex]\rm V_1 = \frac{mv}{4m+M}[/itex]

Now I make a new inertial frame, moving in a straight line at constant speed [itex]\rm V_1[/itex] ,

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/8674/frames3.jpg

where

[itex]\rm V_2 = \frac{mv}{3m+M}[/itex]

Do this two more times, with new inertial frames, to get the last two masses off. The final speed of the car is therefore

[itex]\rm V_{car} = V_1+V_2+V_3+V_4 = \frac{mv}{4m+M}+\frac{mv}{3m+M}+\frac{mv}{2m+M}+\frac{mv}{m+M} = .5078 m/s[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Hi dr k

Ah I see my mistake for neglecting "relative" . Thanks ! :smile:
 
  • #11
songoku said:
Hi dr k

Ah I see my mistake for neglecting "relative" . Thanks ! :smile:

I missed it as well! But I think we've got it covered now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K