I Speed of EM & Mech Waves: Maxwell's Law Explained

Barblorrane
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can mechanical waves be faster than electromagnetic waves?
Based on Maxwell's Law, the speed of light can be defined by:

$$c= \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_{0}\mu_{0}}}$$

Based on that, can we find a medium where a mechanical wave travels faster than a electromagnetic one? If so, how does that works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've written an expression for the speed of light in vacuum. Materials are held together by electromagnetic forces, so changes in the material, such as mechanical waves, propagate via the electromagnetic interaction, so at or below (usually many orders of magnitude below) that speed.

Did you mean a material with a very high refractive index so that light travels very slowly in it? I don't think you can have mechanical waves traveling faster than electromagnetic waves in such a circumstance, for much the same reason as above.

Other things such as electrons may exceed the speed of light in the medium, although they rapidly slow down, emitting Cerenkov radiation as they do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Cosmic Lollipop, Barblorrane and vanhees71
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top