I Speed of the umbra during eclipse vs rate of the Earth's rotation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter imsmooth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth rotation
AI Thread Summary
The Earth rotates faster than the Moon orbits, causing the Moon to appear to move from East to West daily. During a solar eclipse, the Moon's shadow moves from West to East across the Earth's surface due to the curvature of the Earth and the relative speeds involved. The Earth’s rotation at the equator is approximately 500 m/s, while the Moon’s orbital speed is about 1 km/s. This means the Earth's spin is never faster than the Moon's orbital speed, confirming that the shadow will not move East to West, even if the eclipse occurs near noon. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relative speeds and distances involved in these celestial events.
imsmooth
Messages
154
Reaction score
13
The earth rotates faster than the moon orbits. Thus, the moon appears to move from East to West each day. The shadow of the moon during an eclipse as it moves along the curved earth makes it move faster and we see it move West to East.

My question is If a solar eclipse happens near noon and one is directly under the sun-moon alignment, wouldn't the shadow move East to West for a brief moment since the earth rotation is faster at this point? Or is it never faster?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is never faster. The Earth spin makes the equator move about 500 m/s. The Moon’s orbital speed is about 1 km/s.
 
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker
To add to that, it is easy to draw this conclusion knowing only the distance to the Moon (ca 384000 km), the radius of the Earth (ca 6300 km) and the periods (28 days and 1 day). As 6300x28 is about 180000, the corresponding equator speed is about half of the Moon’s orbital speed.
 
Thank you. I should have done the calculation first.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top