I Spherical Geometry Equilateral Pentagon

AI Thread Summary
In spherical geometry, an equilateral pentagon cannot have four right angles because the sum of the angles in a pentagon exceeds 540 degrees. Each angle in a spherical pentagon must be greater than 108 degrees to satisfy this condition. Therefore, having four angles at 90 degrees would result in a total of only 360 degrees, which is insufficient. This leads to the conclusion that it is impossible to construct such a pentagon under these geometric rules. The discussion clarifies the relationship between angle measures and the properties of spherical polygons.
GeometryIsHARD
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey PF! I'm going through a textbook right now and it just said "obviously, you can't have an equilateral pentagon with 4 right angles in spherical geometry (Lambert quadrilaterals).

However, I am not able to make the connection. can somebody help me understand why this is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So every angle must be greater than 108 degrees and therefore it's quite obvious you can't have four of them being 90 degree's. Is that what you are saying?
 
GeometryIsHARD said:
So every angle must be greater than 108 degrees and therefore it's quite obvious you can't have four of them being 90 degree's. Is that what you are saying?

Yes.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top