Spin Coupling, Matrix Building

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the tensor product of two vector spaces in the context of spin coupling, specifically addressing the construction of matrices from eigenstates. Participants confirm that the tensor product of individual eigenspaces containing spin states |x,z> results in a new eigenspace that encapsulates the combined spin states. The construction of matrices from these eigenstates is clarified, emphasizing the necessity of listing all possible two-particle states, such as |x,z>, |x,-z>, | -x,z>, and | -x,-z>. The non-uniqueness of matrix representation due to varying basis choices is also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor products in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and spin states
  • Knowledge of eigenspaces and eigenstates
  • Basic matrix representation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about constructing matrices from eigenstates in quantum systems
  • Explore the implications of basis choice on matrix representation
  • Investigate applications of spin coupling in quantum computing
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone involved in the study of spin systems and matrix representations in quantum theory.

sol66
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
So I understand that the tensor product of two vector spaces constitutes a new vector space. In the case of spin coupling you have some arbitrary vector |x,z> where x represents the spin state of particle 1 and z represents the spin state of particle 2; bot spin states being general 2 element vectors.

This is where I question my understanding, from what I can see ... the tensor product of individual eigenspaces containing vector x and z creates a new eigenspace that holds the general vector |x,z>. Also it seems that you can construct a matrix out of your eigenstates using the basis from your eigenspaces holding the spinstates x and z. So is my understanding correct?

If I am right, my other question is ... how do you construct such a matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to list out all possible two-particle states, such as
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
| x, z \rangle \\
| x, -z \rangle \\
| -x, z \rangle \\
| -x, -z \rangle
\end{pmatrix}
$$
to use the notation in the OP, or more commonly
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
| z, z \rangle \\
| z, -z \rangle \\
| -z, z \rangle \\
| -z, -z \rangle
\end{pmatrix}
$$
As always, the matrix representation is not unique, as the choice of basis is not unique, nor is the order of the elements in a given basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K