I Spin networks: what exactly is a trivalent node?

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfs
Rovelli defines spin networks in this paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1780
for a trivalent node Vn = 0 (the volume)
nodes begin to "get" volume with the four valent case.
take a cube or a tetrahedron, each vertex is linkes to 3 nodes so they would have a null volume.
things are different if we take the reciprocal network: from a node inside a tetrahedron four edges can intersect the four faces.
then we are in the four valent case.
have we to be more precise to talk about the valence of a node?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heidi said:
Rovelli defines spin networks in this paper

Graph theory nomenclature can be confusing, definitions must often be given to maintain the proper content.
And believe it or not some definitions are even excluded from certain theorems.
What is a valence of a node, trivalent node.
A trivalent (3-valent) graph is often called a cubic graph.
A graph consists of a set N of items called nodes (vertices, points etc.), with a set E ⊆ the set of (unordered) pairs of nodes.
The pairs that are in E are called edges (links, arcs etc.) & an edge is said to
“run between” its two nodes, its “endpoints”.
 

Attachments

this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In post #549 here I answered: And then I was surprised by the comment of Tom, asking how the pairing was done. Well, I thought that I had discussed it in some thread in BSM, but after looking at it, it seems that I did only a few sparse remarks here and there. On other hand, people was not liking to interrupt the flow of the thread and I have been either contacted privately or suggested to open a new thread. So here it is. The development can be traced in some draft papers...
Back
Top