Spin projections on different axis

Click For Summary
Quantum entanglement, particularly in the context of the Bell inequality, raises questions about measuring spin along different axes. When Alice measures her entangled electron's spin along the z-axis and finds it in the spin down state, Bob's electron is instantly determined to be in the spin up state. However, Bob's measurement along an axis at an angle theta to the z-axis complicates the situation, as it introduces the concept of spin projection. The key understanding is that Bob's measurement results in either |up> or |down> based on his chosen axis, not the z-axis. This highlights the non-classical nature of quantum mechanics, where measurements are dependent on the orientation of the measurement axis.
turbocod
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently trying to understand the idea of quantum entanglement (more specifically the Bell inequality). But its brought up a lack of my knowledge of spin.

So, I am trying to figure out how spin can be projected onto an arbitrary axis.

Suppose there are two entangled electrons of state 1/sqrt(2)(|up>|down> + |down>|up>). Where the first ket denotes Alice's particle and the second denotes Bobs. Now, if Alice measures spin along the z axis (where the z axis is the basis of the spins), she finds the electron in spin down state.

Now, Bob's electron must be in the spin up state. But he measures along an axis at an angle theta to the z-axis. I am having trouble picturing here how his subsequent measurement could be |up> or |down>. Since unless the measurement is being made at 90 degrees to z, there would surely only be a component of spin in the up or down direction on Bobs axis (not both).

Can anyone help me understand this? I'm finding myself incredibly confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
turbocod said:
Now, Bob's electron must be in the spin up state. But he measures along an axis at an angle theta to the z-axis. I am having trouble picturing here how his subsequent measurement could be |up> or |down>.
It is up or down with respect with the axis he is measuring at, not with respect to the z axis, to which |up> and |down> correspond.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K