Undergrad Spontaneous parametric down-conversion entanglement using BBO

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the creation of Bell's entangled state |ψ⟩ = 1/√2 (|HH⟩ + |VV⟩) using type I BBO (Beta Barium Borate) crystals. It clarifies that two orthogonally positioned crystals emit photon pairs, leading to the formation of the Bell state at their intersection. The key properties enabling this entanglement include the coherent down-conversion processes in each crystal and the interaction with photons polarized at 45 degrees, which introduces quantum uncertainty. This setup is essential for understanding the correlations observed during photon measurement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement and Bell states
  • Knowledge of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC)
  • Familiarity with polarization states of photons
  • Basic principles of quantum optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanics of spontaneous parametric down-conversion in detail
  • Explore the mathematical representation of Bell states and their properties
  • Learn about the role of polarization in quantum optics experiments
  • Investigate the implications of quantum uncertainty in entangled photon pairs
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum information science will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on entanglement and quantum optics applications.

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have a question about the creation of the Bell's entanglement state ##1/\sqrt{2} (|HH> + |VV>)##using type I BBO crystals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion).

Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state. But I don't understand why.
Indeed, if I do measurement of the photons with two polarizers, one at 90° and the other 0°, I don't understand why I will have 0 correlation. For me I could detect for example the signal photon of the ##|HH>## state and the idler photon of the ##|VV>##.

I hope my "question" is clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paul159 said:
Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state.

Where are you getting this from? Not from the article you linked to; that just talks about producing one photon pair using one crystal.
 
Paul159 said:

Thanks for the reference. It looks to me like the key properties of this setup that allows it to produce the Bell-type state are:

(1) The two crystals act on the two orthogonal polarization components (##H## and ##V##);

(2) The down-conversion processes in each crystal are coherent, so an input photon polarized at 45 degrees (halfway between ##H## and ##V##) will create quantum uncertainty about which crystal is doing the downconversion; this is what creates the Bell-type entangled state.
 
Yes of course, I understand now. Thanks !
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
522
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K