Spontaneous parametric down-conversion entanglement using BBO

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the creation of Bell's entanglement state using type I BBO crystals in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Participants explore the mechanics of photon pair emission from orthogonally positioned crystals and the implications for measurement correlations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reasoning behind the formation of the Bell state from two orthogonal crystals emitting photon pairs and expresses confusion about measurement correlations.
  • Another participant challenges the initial claim, suggesting that the linked article does not support the assertion about producing a Bell state from two crystals.
  • A reference to an arXiv paper is provided, which outlines that the two crystals interact with orthogonal polarization components and that coherent down-conversion processes create quantum uncertainty, leading to the Bell-type entangled state.
  • One participant acknowledges understanding after the clarification provided by the reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes disagreement regarding the initial claim about the Bell state formation and the interpretation of the linked article. Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanics of the setup.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the initial claims and the assumptions regarding the coherence of the down-conversion processes and their role in creating entanglement.

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have a question about the creation of the Bell's entanglement state ##1/\sqrt{2} (|HH> + |VV>)##using type I BBO crystals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion).

Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state. But I don't understand why.
Indeed, if I do measurement of the photons with two polarizers, one at 90° and the other 0°, I don't understand why I will have 0 correlation. For me I could detect for example the signal photon of the ##|HH>## state and the idler photon of the ##|VV>##.

I hope my "question" is clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paul159 said:
Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state.

Where are you getting this from? Not from the article you linked to; that just talks about producing one photon pair using one crystal.
 
Paul159 said:

Thanks for the reference. It looks to me like the key properties of this setup that allows it to produce the Bell-type state are:

(1) The two crystals act on the two orthogonal polarization components (##H## and ##V##);

(2) The down-conversion processes in each crystal are coherent, so an input photon polarized at 45 degrees (halfway between ##H## and ##V##) will create quantum uncertainty about which crystal is doing the downconversion; this is what creates the Bell-type entangled state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul159
Yes of course, I understand now. Thanks !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
726
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K