Undergrad Spontaneous parametric down-conversion entanglement using BBO

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the creation of Bell's entanglement state using type I BBO crystals in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. It explains that two orthogonally positioned crystals emit photon pairs in horizontal (|HH>) or vertical (|VV>) polarizations, leading to the formation of the Bell state at their intersection. A key point is that the down-conversion processes in each crystal are coherent, allowing for quantum uncertainty when an input photon is polarized at 45 degrees. This uncertainty is crucial for generating the entangled state, as it prevents definitive identification of which crystal produced which photon. The clarification resolves initial confusion regarding measurement correlations with polarizers.
Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have a question about the creation of the Bell's entanglement state ##1/\sqrt{2} (|HH> + |VV>)##using type I BBO crystals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion).

Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state. But I don't understand why.
Indeed, if I do measurement of the photons with two polarizers, one at 90° and the other 0°, I don't understand why I will have 0 correlation. For me I could detect for example the signal photon of the ##|HH>## state and the idler photon of the ##|VV>##.

I hope my "question" is clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paul159 said:
Two crystals are put orthogonal to each other and each of them emits a photon pair (##|HH>## or ##|VV>##). Then at the intersection of the two emitted cones we have the Bell's state.

Where are you getting this from? Not from the article you linked to; that just talks about producing one photon pair using one crystal.
 
Paul159 said:

Thanks for the reference. It looks to me like the key properties of this setup that allows it to produce the Bell-type state are:

(1) The two crystals act on the two orthogonal polarization components (##H## and ##V##);

(2) The down-conversion processes in each crystal are coherent, so an input photon polarized at 45 degrees (halfway between ##H## and ##V##) will create quantum uncertainty about which crystal is doing the downconversion; this is what creates the Bell-type entangled state.
 
Yes of course, I understand now. Thanks !
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
382
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K