Springs and Splitting Mass Concept Confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a block attached to a horizontal spring oscillating at a frequency of 3 Hz and an amplitude of 5.08 x 10-2 m. When the block splits into two parts at maximum speed, the amplitude of the remaining mass is reduced by a factor of √2, while the frequency increases by the same factor. When the block splits at the extreme position, the potential energy remains constant, leading to no change in amplitude, but the frequency still increases due to the halved mass. The relationship between kinetic and potential energy is crucial for understanding these changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion for springs
  • Basic grasp of oscillation frequency and amplitude relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations governing simple harmonic motion, specifically Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)
  • Explore the conservation of energy in oscillatory systems, focusing on kinetic and potential energy transformations
  • Investigate the effects of mass changes on frequency and amplitude in spring systems
  • Learn about the implications of splitting masses in oscillatory systems and their impact on motion dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of oscillatory motion and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

snowcrystal42
Am I thinking about this problem correctly?

"A block is attached to a horizontal spring and oscillates back and forth on a frictionless horizontal surface at a frequency of 3 Hz. The amplitude of the motion is 5.08 x 10-2 m. At the point where the block has its maximum speed, it suddenly splits into two parts, only one part remaining attached to the string. (a) What are the amplitude and frequency of the simple harmonic motion that exists after the block splits? (b) What about when the block splits while at one of the extreme ends?"

(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same? If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snowcrystal42 said:
(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?
The answer key is probably using conservation of energy and relating the energy at the point of maximum speed to the energy at maximum amplitude.

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?
Yes. The half of the mass that is not attached to the spring has no effect on the motion of the half of the mass that is still attached to the spring.

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?
Yes. You could also get this result by using the relation between f and √(k/m) as you note at the end of your post.

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same?
Yes
If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?
Think about a mass on a spring and starting the motion by pulling the mass a certain distance D from equilibrium and letting it go from rest. How is the amplitude A related to the distance D? Does your answer depend on the amount of mass that is attached to the spring?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?
When you break the block at the point of maximum speed are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system? When you break the block at the point of maximum ampliltude, are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?
Yes to your final question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
953
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K