Springs and Splitting Mass Concept Confusion

If ω changes and k does not change, what must also change?In summary, the conversation discusses a block attached to a horizontal spring undergoing simple harmonic motion on a frictionless surface. The block suddenly splits into two parts at the point of maximum speed, leading to questions about the amplitude and frequency of the motion after the split. It is determined that the amplitude is divided by √2 and the frequency is multiplied by √2. The potential energy stays the same when the block is split while at the extreme ends, and the amplitude does not change. The frequency changes because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m).
  • #1
snowcrystal42
Am I thinking about this problem correctly?

"A block is attached to a horizontal spring and oscillates back and forth on a frictionless horizontal surface at a frequency of 3 Hz. The amplitude of the motion is 5.08 x 10-2 m. At the point where the block has its maximum speed, it suddenly splits into two parts, only one part remaining attached to the string. (a) What are the amplitude and frequency of the simple harmonic motion that exists after the block splits? (b) What about when the block splits while at one of the extreme ends?"

(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same? If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
snowcrystal42 said:
(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?
The answer key is probably using conservation of energy and relating the energy at the point of maximum speed to the energy at maximum amplitude.

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?
Yes. The half of the mass that is not attached to the spring has no effect on the motion of the half of the mass that is still attached to the spring.

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?
Yes. You could also get this result by using the relation between f and √(k/m) as you note at the end of your post.

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same?
Yes
If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?
Think about a mass on a spring and starting the motion by pulling the mass a certain distance D from equilibrium and letting it go from rest. How is the amplitude A related to the distance D? Does your answer depend on the amount of mass that is attached to the spring?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?
When you break the block at the point of maximum speed are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system? When you break the block at the point of maximum ampliltude, are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?
Yes to your final question.
 

What is the concept of springs and splitting mass?

The concept of springs and splitting mass is related to the study of mechanical systems and their behavior under external forces. It involves understanding the behavior of springs, which are elastic materials that can be stretched or compressed, and the concept of splitting mass, which refers to dividing a mass into smaller parts to analyze its behavior.

How do springs behave under external forces?

Springs have a characteristic of exerting a restoring force when stretched or compressed. This means that when an external force is applied to a spring, it will try to return to its original shape and length. The amount of restoring force depends on the stiffness of the spring, which is determined by its material and shape.

What is the significance of splitting mass in mechanical systems?

Splitting mass is used to simplify the analysis of complex mechanical systems by breaking them down into smaller, simpler components. This allows engineers and scientists to better understand the behavior of the system and make accurate predictions about its performance under different conditions.

How are springs and splitting mass related?

Springs and splitting mass are related in the sense that they are both used to study and understand the behavior of mechanical systems. Springs are often used in conjunction with splitting mass to analyze the effects of external forces on a system and determine its overall behavior.

What are some real-world applications of the concepts of springs and splitting mass?

The concepts of springs and splitting mass have numerous real-world applications, such as in the design of suspension systems for vehicles, shock absorbers for buildings, and springs used in various mechanical devices. They are also used in the study of sound and vibration, as well as in the design of prosthetics and medical devices.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
906
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
360
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
335
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
441
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
249
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top