Square of z-component of angular momentum eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the square of the z-component of angular momentum eigenvalues, represented by the operator equation $$\hat{L}_z^2 | l, m \rangle = m^2 \hbar^2 | l, m \rangle$$, follows from the eigenvalue equation $$\hat{L}_z | l, m \rangle = m \hbar | l, m \rangle$$. The participant attempts to apply the operator $$\hat{L}_z^2$$ to a function $$f(x,y)$$, resulting in a complex expression involving second derivatives. The conclusion emphasizes that calculations involving angular momentum operators are more straightforward in the Hilbert-space formulation compared to the position representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenstates and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of Hilbert space concepts
  • Basic proficiency in differential operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the Hilbert space formulation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of $$\hat{L}^2$$ and its implications
  • Review the application of differential operators in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on angular momentum, eigenvalue problems, and mathematical formulations in quantum theory.

tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm trying to demonstrate that if:

$$\hat{L}_z | l, m \rangle = m \hbar | l, m \rangle$$

Then

$$\hat{L}_z^2 | l, m \rangle = m^2 \hbar^2 | l, m \rangle$$

Homework Equations



$$\hat{L}^2 = \hat{L}_x^2 + \hat{L}_y^2 + \hat{L}_z^2$$
$$\hat{L}_z = -i\hbar \left [ x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right ]$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not really sure where to start with this. I can apply the operator ##\hat{L}_z^2## to an arbitrary function ##f(x,y)##, but that gives me:

$$\hat{L}_z^2 f(x,y) = \hbar^2\left(x^2 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} - xy \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} -xy \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial y} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \right)f(x,y) $$
I've no idea if this demonstrates anything at all...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't think too complicated. Just apply [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] twice to the eigenstate. Generally one can say that almost any calculation concerning angular-momentum operators is easier in the representation-free Hilbert-space formulation than using the differential operators of the position representation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K