Standard harmonic motion question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a block on a piston undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM). Participants explore the conditions under which the block separates from the piston and the maximum frequency for continuous contact, given a specific period and amplitude of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to find maximum acceleration and question how to relate it to the forces acting on the block and piston. There are attempts to derive equations for acceleration and considerations of gravitational effects.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided equations and insights into the relationship between acceleration and the conditions for separation. There is an ongoing exploration of the physical implications of the SHM parameters, with some guidance offered regarding the use of acceleration and frequency.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of mass in the problem setup and question the relevance of the driving mechanism for the piston's motion. The discussion includes considerations of gravity and the forces acting on the block and piston.

sigmavirus
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A block rides on a piston that is moving vertically with simple harmonic motion. (a) If the SHM has period 1.0 s, at what amplitude of motion will the block and piston separate? (b) If the piston has an amplitude of 5.0 cm, what is the maximum frequency for which the block and piston will be in contact continuously?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us what you've got so far.
 
Thanks for responding. Well, I am guessing that I need to find the maximum acceleration using what I am given, but I don't know how to.
 
Start with the equations you have that describe simple harmonic motion.
 
Well i tried using a(t)=-[tex]\omega[/tex]2xcos([tex]\omega[/tex]t+[tex]\phi[/tex]) but i came out with two variables. I had a=-4[tex]\pi[/tex]2xcos(2[tex]\pi[/tex]t)
 
sigmavirus said:
Well i tried using a(t)=-[tex]\omega[/tex]2xcos([tex]\omega[/tex]t+[tex]\phi[/tex]) but i came out with two variables. I had a=-4[tex]\pi[/tex]2xcos(2[tex]\pi[/tex]t)

Not sure what the 2nd equation means, but the first one us reasonable.

Now step back for a second. For the block to separate from the piston at the top of the travel, what acceleration must it have? What is pulling the block downward through the whole range of motion?
 
the second equation is when i plugged in values. I plugged in w, which i got using w=2[tex]\pi[/tex]f. And do i need to account for gravity and the spring?
 
sigmavirus said:
the second equation is when i plugged in values. I plugged in w, which i got using w=2[tex]\pi[/tex]f. And do i need to account for gravity and the spring?

Can you answer my "step back" question first?
 
i said gravity and the spring
 
  • #10
sigmavirus said:
i said gravity and the spring

Who said there's any spring? There are other ways to drive the piston in SHM, and in this problem, the driving mechanism would appear to be irrelevant, I believe.
 
  • #11
sorry, i meant to say piston. so gravity pulls down and the piston pushes up. i don't have a mass, though. could i use F=-m[tex]\omega[/tex]2x and Fg=mg and set them equal?
 
  • #12
sigmavirus said:
sorry, i meant to say piston. so gravity pulls down and the piston pushes up. i don't have a mass, though. could i use F=-m[tex]\omega[/tex]2x and Fg=mg and set them equal?

I don't think I'd use forces. Just stick with accelerations. At the top of the piston's motion, if the mass separates just slightly from the piston as the piston starts downward, what is the downward acceleration of the separated block? So the piston's acceleration at that same moment has to be what?
 
  • #13
they must be equal?
 
  • #14
sigmavirus said:
they must be equal?

Yes. That would be the point where there just barely could be some separation. If the piston accelerates downward even a but faster than that, there definitely will be separation.

So you had a correct equation earlier for the acceleration of the piston in terms of omega. You can use omega = 2*pi*f as you said, and write the equation in terms of the piston frequency (or period). I assume in your equation that "x" was the maximum single-sided amplitude of the piston's motion, right? That part will be important in the part (b) of the question as well.

So go ahead and solve parts (a) and (b), and show us your work and the solutions.
 
  • #15
should i use -9.8m/s2 for my acceleration? and should i use the period for my time?
 
  • #16
sigmavirus said:
should i use -9.8m/s2 for my acceleration? and should i use the period for my time?

Yes on the acceleration. On the time -- try thinking more intuitively that that. What is the max acceleration of the piston? When does it occur in its motion?

They gave you the period mostly so that you could figure out omega, which along with the amplitude leads you to the max acceleration...

I going to be away from computers for a few hours, but will check back in later tonight. Just relax and think about what is going on physically, and write out the equations. (And be sure to check your units.)
 
  • #17
i solved it with another equation. it was amax=[tex]\omega[/tex]2xmax. my teacher says i got the right answer. thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
19K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
988
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K