Standard Model Completely Wrong

In summary, the Standard Model is a widely accepted theory in physics that explains the fundamental particles and their interactions through three forces. However, it is not a complete theory as it does not account for gravity and the existence of dark matter and dark energy. Evidence such as discrepancies between theory and experiments and the inability to explain certain phenomena suggest that it may be incorrect. Proposed alternatives to the Standard Model include supersymmetry and string theory. If the Standard Model is proven wrong, it would have significant implications for the scientific community, potentially leading to new discoveries and developments in the field.
  • #1
curiousphoton
117
2
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/07/science/la-sci-proton-20100708

Like the article says, if this experiment is true, the proton is 4% smaller than originally thought. If true, doesn't this mean we have to throw out everything we think we know about particle physics (standard model, 'spooky' QM equations, etc...)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

What is the Standard Model?

The Standard Model is a theory in physics that describes the fundamental particles and their interactions through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces. It has been successful in predicting and explaining many experimental results.

How could the Standard Model be completely wrong?

While the Standard Model has been extremely successful, it is not a complete theory. It does not include gravity, and there are several unexplained phenomena, such as dark matter and dark energy, that it cannot account for. This has led some scientists to believe that there may be a more comprehensive theory that will replace the Standard Model.

What evidence suggests that the Standard Model is wrong?

One of the main pieces of evidence that the Standard Model may be wrong is the fact that it cannot explain the existence and behavior of dark matter and dark energy. Additionally, there are discrepancies between theoretical predictions and experimental results, particularly in the realm of particle interactions at high energies.

What are some proposed alternatives to the Standard Model?

There are several theories that have been proposed as alternatives to the Standard Model. These include supersymmetry, which suggests that every particle has a partner with a different spin, and string theory, which posits that particles are actually tiny strings vibrating at different frequencies.

What would it mean for the scientific community if the Standard Model is proven wrong?

If the Standard Model is proven wrong, it would be a major breakthrough in physics. It would require a significant shift in our understanding of the fundamental laws of nature and could potentially lead to new developments and discoveries in the field. However, it is also possible that the Standard Model may just need to be modified or expanded upon, rather than completely replaced.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
909
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top