Star Trek Revamped: New CGI Exterior Shots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star Star trek
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the remastered versions of the original Star Trek series, specifically focusing on the new CGI exterior shots that have replaced the original effects. Participants explore the implications of these changes on their viewing experience and the series' legacy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the enhanced clarity and detail of the remastered episodes, particularly in the CGI exterior shots that were not part of the original broadcasts.
  • Another participant explains that the remastered episodes involved scanning original negatives and replacing many 1960s effects with CGI, while also correcting color and removing flaws.
  • Some participants express excitement about rewatching the series with updated graphics, viewing it as a fresh experience.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the CGI enhancements detract from the original charm of the series, with some arguing that the low-budget effects were integral to its appeal.
  • There is a discussion about the mixed feelings among "hardcore ST purists" regarding the new CGI, with some feeling it looks too artificial and lacks the texture of the original models.
  • One participant mentions the incongruity of mixing 1960s effects with modern CGI while appreciating that the plot and themes remain unchanged.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about the remastered CGI effects, with some embracing the changes and others criticizing them. There is no consensus on whether the enhancements improve or detract from the series.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the original series' charm and the impact of its low-budget effects, indicating that the perception of the remastered versions may depend on individual attachment to the original aesthetics.

Janus
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,759
Reaction score
1,978
I was flipping through the channels this evening and came across an old Star Trek (original series) episode. Since I hadn't seen one in while (It is shown at 10pm, and lately I've had to get up early Sun AM, and I am in bed by then), I decided to watch it.

I had just recently purchased a 47" HDTV, and the station was being broadcast in digital, but I was still surprised how nice and clear the picture was, and how much detail was visible. The exterior space shots looked particularly good.

When the climax of the show arrived I saw something that really surprised me!

In this episode, the Enterprise has to fly in towards the Sun and then pull away. They showed the Enterprise flying in toward the Sun and then the Enterprise skimming the surface of the Sun. I didn't remember this second shot ever being in the episode! As I watched the rest of the episode, I noted even more differences in the exterior shots than from what I remembered (Now that my attention had been brought to them).

After the show ended I got on the web to see what was up or if my memmory was just playing tricks on me. I found out that it wasn't my memmory. It seems that they have just recently released Star Trek on HD-DVD (apparently this station was showing the HD-DVD episodes which explained the extra detail I noted) . The kicker is that they went back and replaced the exterior space shots with CGI shots. The reason that I didn't remember the shot of the Enterprise skimming the surface of the Sun was that it was not in the original episode.

Now I'm looking forward to seeing what they've done with the other episodes. It's like watching them new all over again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That was one of the Remastered episodes you saw. They've scanned the original negatives using the latest tech and reprocessed the resulting images frame by frame to do colour corrections, remove scratches and other flaws and replaced a lot of the 60s era FX with CG (mostly exterior shots).

The first season of the Remastered series is available now on DVD/HD-DVD combo disks. Second season should be hitting the airwaves (or coax) soon if it hasn't started airing already.

http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/TOS/article/28095.html
 
Excellent! Now I have an entirely new excuse to watch the series all over again. :biggrin:
 
Cool.

Did they manage to enhance the acting as well?
 
out of whack said:
Did they manage to enhance the acting as well?

If they did that then it wouldn't be Star Trek!
 
Ivan Seeking said:
If they did that then it wouldn't be Star Trek!

Yeah really, cheap FX were part of the original "cachet" of the series so CGI detracts from it. But really the acting is what sealed it so you don't want to screw around with that!
 
WOW! This is amazing! I love startrek TOS! :D.. Finally with them graphix up to date..

Hope they'll do the lot..

But.. hey.. wait a min. Isn't it a danger they'll destroy the beauty by cheap effects? Sharpening up the images is cool.. but, obvious digital arts are bad.. :(
 
Last edited:
Some hardcore ST purists are definitely not fans of the new CG, some saying it looks too artificial, lacks the texture of the original models, etc. To me it seems somewhat incongruous seeing 60s stage FX (kind of hard to replace some of that with CG) mixed with 21st century CG. I still like it though. It's changed visually, but it's not like the plot or underlying themes have been altered.

A few weeks ago The Menagerie was shown in theaters in all its HD glory. It was pretty cool seeing it on a big screen.
 
Here's a link that shows an example of the difference between the original version and the new tweaked version.

http://www.startrek.com/custom/include/feature/bst/tos-enhanced/tos-019a/pop.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Wow, I had no idea that they'd remastered Star Trek. Sounds interesting. So is the first season on the air already?

Incidentally I can see why some of the "purists" might be upset about this. Alas, we all love Star Trek, but the special effects were downright horrible compared to what we've got today.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
23K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K