How Does Starlink's Phased Array Antenna Track Satellites Without Moving?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Array
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Starlink utilizes a phased array antenna system to track satellites without mechanical movement, employing hundreds of synchronized antenna elements with picosecond precision. This technology allows for effective communication with satellites emitting radio frequency signals, optimizing gain in specific directions. The system is priced at $499, despite reported production costs of $2400 per unit, indicating a strategic pricing model aimed at capturing a large subscriber base. Starlink's business model anticipates significant revenue growth, targeting approximately $30 billion annually within a decade.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phased array antenna technology
  • Familiarity with radio frequency (RF) communication principles
  • Knowledge of satellite communication systems
  • Awareness of market dynamics in telecommunications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the technical specifications of phased array antennas
  • Explore the implications of satellite communication in urban vs. rural settings
  • Investigate the regulatory challenges faced by satellite internet providers
  • Learn about advancements in laser communication technology for satellites
USEFUL FOR

Telecommunications engineers, satellite communication specialists, business analysts in the tech sector, and anyone interested in the future of internet connectivity through satellite technology.

Messages
37,398
Reaction score
14,226
TL;DR
Disassembly of a phased array antenna for Starlink
Starlink has begun its public beta phase, and naturally some people were more interested in the electronics than in fast internet access.

Here is a video how the satellite receiver looks inside. The first half is focused on the mechanical side, the second half is looking at the electronics.
It is a phased array antenna, i.e. hundreds of small antennas that need to be synchronized with picosecond precision. By adjust the delay between the antennas the overall device can track satellites across the sky without moving mechanically.

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Greg Bernhardt, Spinnor, Lord Crc and 1 other person
Engineering news on Phys.org
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10770790B1/en

Abstract

A phased array antenna system configured for communication with a satellite that emits or receives radio frequency (RF) signals and has a repeating ground track in a first direction, the antenna system includes a phased array antenna including a plurality of antenna elements distributed in a plurality of M columns oriented in the first direction and a plurality of N rows extending in a second direction normal to the first direction, and a plurality of fixed phase shifters aligned for phase offsets between antenna elements in the first direction and a gain-enhancement system configured for gain enhancement in the second direction of radio frequency signals received by and emitted from the phased array antenna.

pdf of patent, https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f2/d3/89/e2fec3d1703a51/US10770790.pdf

1606570128683.png
 

Attachments

  • 1606569696114.png
    1606569696114.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 349
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes PhDeezNutz, Greg Bernhardt and anorlunda
It's remarkable that they can sell it for only $499.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
It's quite likely that they sell it at a loss. Businessinsider claims to have sources that SpaceX bought 1 million terminals for $2400 each from STMicroelectronics. I don't know how reliable that is, but "more than $500" is very plausible. If the $2400 number is true then SpaceX will need to sell ~1.5 years of $100/month service just to recover the loss on the receiver. Subsequent receivers will be cheaper, and SpaceX plans to produce most of them in-house in the future.
 
  • Informative
Likes anorlunda
It will be very interesting to find out how many subscribers Starlink can hope to get globally. 1 billion subscribers at $100/month, would mean a gross income of 1.2 trillion per year. Maybe that is more than they can handle. There are rumors about an IPO, and if that happens, Starlink will have to disclose their business plan.

With Starlink, you will have to share bandwidth with your neighbors. Therefore, performance in the most dense cities will be the lowest, and conversely the highest for rural customers. Rural customers are the ones most starved for Internet right now, so I would guess that Starlink would be especially appealing to them.

It will also be interesting to learn if countries like China try to block Starlink or to regulate it. China has had great success so far with the great firewall.

It will also be interesting if those phased array antennas will be able to keep a lock for mobile installations. I'm thinking of the roof of a truck or a boat rocking in heavy seas.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Starlink can't handle a billion users (with high bandwidth for each user), and it's interesting in rural areas only. If they manage to add laser links then they can sign up a few urban customers interested in the lowest possible pings.

They hope to get ~$30 billion/year in revenue in 10+ years. The price for customers will be adjusted based on the local markets, it means a bit over 30 million users.
anorlunda said:
It will also be interesting to learn if countries like China try to block Starlink or to regulate it.
SpaceX needs to get permissions in each country they want to service. For now they have that in the US and Canada and some partial approvals elsewhere.

Starlink has been tested successfully on aircraft and they have some devices on their ships. They have GPS and can detect their orientation, a bit of movement from a ship shouldn't make a difference.
 
Spacex just released this video yesterday answering technical questions about Starlink.

 
  • Informative
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #10
[Note -- an off-topic discussion about YouTube videos has been removed from this thread]
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and sophiecentaur
  • #11
berkeman said:
[Note -- an off-topic discussion about YouTube videos has been removed from this thread]
No prob. Less is more!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K