MHB State the differences between an expression and its simplified equivalent.

AI Thread Summary
The primary difference between an expression and its simplified equivalent lies in the presence of removable singularities, as illustrated by the example f(x) = x/x, which simplifies to f(x) = 1 for x ≠ 0. The simplified expression is generally considered simpler and more straightforward. However, understanding these differences often requires context from specific courses or textbooks that define terms like "expression," "simplified," and "equivalent." Such educational materials typically provide examples that clarify the process of simplification. Overall, context is essential for accurately discussing the differences between expressions and their simplified forms.
arroww
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
State the differences between an expression and its simplified equivalent.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The main difference that comes to my mind is that of removable singularities. For example, consider:

$$f(x)=\frac{x}{x}$$

This is the same as :

$$f(x)=1$$ where $$x\ne0$$
 
arroww said:
State the differences between an expression and its simplified equivalent.
The only think that I can say is that the second expression is presumably simpler. Unfortunately, it is not possible to answer this question outside the context of a particular course or book. This context must provide definitions for such concepts and "expression", "simplified" and "equivalent". I would guess the course or book also give a number of examples of simplifications that can help answer the question.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top