Stationary States: Differential Equations Issues

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a differential equation from Griffith's textbook related to stationary states in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of separating variables in the equation and the conditions under which each side can be considered equal to a constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why each side of the equation can be set equal to a constant, noting the separation of variables into functions of time and space.
  • Another participant suggests that the equation must hold true for any value of x and t, implying that the right-hand side must evaluate to a constant when the left-hand side is evaluated at a specific time.
  • Some participants propose exploring the possibility of finding a non-constant function that satisfies both sides of the equation independently, raising questions about the nature of the functions involved.
  • There is a clarification about the notation used in the equation, specifically regarding the representation of h-bar in LaTeX.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to evaluate the equation for specific values of x and t, but there remains uncertainty about the implications of setting the sides equal to a constant and whether non-constant solutions can exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions regarding the nature of the functions involved in the equation.

Elwin.Martin
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
So in Griffith's (ed. 2 page 37) there's an equation that says that
**pretend the h's are h-bars...I don't know Latex very well**

ih[itex]\frac{1}{\varphi}[/itex][itex]\frac{d\varphi}{dt}[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{h^{2}}{2m}[/itex][itex]\frac{1}{\psi}[/itex][itex]\frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}[/itex]+V

Since in this simplified case V where is a function of x alone he says that each side is equal to a constant but I'm still trying to figure out why.

I can see that the LHS is a function of t alone because he made the wave function separable and the [itex]\varphi[/itex] is a function of t and the [itex]\psi[/itex] is a function of x but I'm not sure why it's important. I see that if we set the equation equal to a constant the rest of the math works out nicely but I can't see what allows us to do this.

If we had say [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{dz}{dt}[/itex] and we set the whole thing equal to c, how would I know that y(x) = cx and z(t) = ct (they're the same constant right?) so y(x)/x=z(t)/t ?


Any direction would be great and thank you for your time,
elwin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elwin.Martin said:
**pretend the h's are h-bars...I don't know Latex very well**

h-bar in Latex is \hbar (surprise! ).

The equation has to be true for any value of x and any value of t.

First pick a value of t and use it to evaluate the LHS. This gives you a number. No matter what value you use for x, the RHS must evaluate to that number. So the RHS is constant.

Now start over. Pick a value of x and use it to evaluate the RHS... (see if you can fill in the rest.)
 
Can you see another possibility? Remember that mathematically, a variable is free to take any value in its domain. So if the LHS is only a function of t, and the RHS is only a function of x, can you find any function f(x,t) that is NOT a constant, yet still satisfies both sides of the equation independently?

In other words, what you are given is:

g(x)=h(t)

and I am asking you to do is find any f(x,t) that is NOT a constant and satisfies BOTH

g(x)=f(x,t)

AND

h(t)=f(x,t)

for ALL allowable values of x and t.
 
jtbell said:
h-bar in Latex is \hbar (surprise! ).

The equation has to be true for any value of x and any value of t.

First pick a value of t and use it to evaluate the LHS. This gives you a number. No matter what value you use for x, the RHS must evaluate to that number. So the RHS is constant.

Now start over. Pick a value of x and use it to evaluate the RHS... (see if you can fill in the rest.)

haha thank you for that

I think I see what you mean now.
 
SpectraCat said:
Can you see another possibility? Remember that mathematically, a variable is free to take any value in its domain. So if the LHS is only a function of t, and the RHS is only a function of x, can you find any function f(x,t) that is NOT a constant, yet still satisfies both sides of the equation independently?

In other words, what you are given is:

g(x)=h(t)

and I am asking you to do is find any f(x,t) that is NOT a constant and satisfies BOTH

g(x)=f(x,t)

AND

h(t)=f(x,t)

for ALL allowable values of x and t.

That makes a whole lot more sense!

thank you very much for your time,
elwin.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K