Statistical Mechanics, partition function for mixing

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the partition function in statistical mechanics, specifically the comparison between the partition functions before mixing (Z1) and after mixing (Z2). The participant highlights a discrepancy where Z1 appears larger than Z2 due to the factorial term N!/(NA! * NB!), suggesting that the Helmholtz free energy before mixing is lower than after mixing, which contradicts the expectation that mixing increases entropy and is spontaneous. A key insight is the necessity of consistent volume treatment, leading to the corrected expression for the ratio of partition functions, which indicates that Z1/Z2 is less than 1 when volumes are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly partition functions.
  • Familiarity with Helmholtz free energy and its implications in thermodynamics.
  • Knowledge of combinatorial mathematics, specifically binomial coefficients.
  • Basic principles of entropy and spontaneity in physical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the partition function in statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about Helmholtz free energy and its role in determining spontaneity.
  • Explore combinatorial methods in statistical mechanics, focusing on binomial coefficients.
  • Investigate the relationship between volume, pressure, and spontaneity in mixing processes.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and physical chemistry, will benefit from this discussion.

jin94
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! The following image is taken from my note in Stat Mech. Please excuse my ugly handwriting...

I copied this from my professor's note on a whiteboard, and I'm not so sure if it is correct. The equations for Z1 (partition function before mixing) and Z2 (partition function after mixing) seems to imply that Z1 is much larger than Z2 (since N!/(NA! *NB!) is a large number). However, the Z=exp(-bF) then implies that the Helmlholtz free energy before mixing is lower that after mixing, indicating that mixing is not spontaneous. This is against what I have learned so far, since mixing increases entropy and, therefore, spontaneous. Could you please clarify this for me? I have been struggling with this all day long ... thank you so much! If it is hard to read, please let me know.

This is from my note in stat mech.
12822732_10207393493649837_670698776_o.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been years since I've done this stuff, so I might be off-base with this, but it looks to me like the problem is that you don't treat volume consistently. So you have (correctly) ##N_A+N_B=N##, but you also need ##V_A+V_B=V##, because otherwise, you've got box ##N_A## with volume ##V## and box ##N_B## with volume ##V## and you're trying to cram them both into box ##N## with the same volume ##V##, so you're increasing the pressure in the final box (therefore it's not spontaneous--you have to do work on the system). Reworking it with ##V_A+V_B=V## gives you
$$\frac{Z_1}{Z_2} = \frac{V_A^{N_A} V_B^{N_B}}{V^N} \frac{N!}{N_A!N_B!}$$
This is kind of a gross expression that I don't want to think very hard about first thing in the morning, but if you just examine a simple case where ##V_A=V_B##, then you get
$$\frac{Z_1}{Z_2} = \frac{N!}{2^N N_A!N_B!}$$
which is less than 1. To see this, notice that
$$ \frac{N!}{N_A!N_B!} = \binom{N}{N_A}$$
is a binomial coefficient and recall the relation:
$$\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} = 2^n$$
Again, I don't know if this is right, but the volume thing jumped out at me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K