Statistical mechanics & the interaction energy

Click For Summary
Interaction energy in statistical mechanics can often be neglected when particles are sufficiently far apart, but the exact distance depends on the nature of the interaction. For gravitational interactions, such as between the Earth and Moon, the energy becomes negligible at distances significantly greater than their current separation. In the case of strong interactions between nuclei, the interaction is minimal beyond a few femtometers, and electromagnetic forces become more relevant at larger separations. There is no definitive limit for when interaction energy can be ignored, as it varies based on the specific forces involved and the context of the system. Ultimately, the concept of a precise boundary for neglecting interaction energy is more about estimation than exactitude.
shadi_s10
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
hi everyone!
I am so confused about interaction energy!
as you know, in many statistical mechanics books we see there are equations which are taken in a non-interacting system.

for example for a two particle system, you can see the total energy is:
E = E1 +E2 +E12
while E12 is the interaction energy between particle 1 and particle 2.

What I want to know is that when can we neglect this interaction energy?
how far is interaction energy's range?

can anybody give me a formula or something for it?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the nature of the interaction. For example:
_ If the 2 "particles" are Moon and Earth, the interaction between them is gravitation. In this case, it's obvious that when they are very far from each other (say, 1000 times Earth's radius; we know that the actual distance between Earth and Moon is around 60 times Earth's radius), E12 is negligible.
_ Consider the strong interaction between nuclei. If the nuclei, 2 protons for example, are separate at a distance larger than the nuclear radius (around a few fm), strong interaction is negligible, and now instead, we have to consider the electromagnetic interaction between them (protons are charges after all). Again, if we further separate them, say around the distance between surrounding atoms/molecules, the protons are now affected more by the surrounding, and thus, the interaction between the protons is again negligible.
So how far the particles are when their interaction is negligible, it depends on the interaction's nature, ranging from 10^-15m to thousands of km.
 
Thanks a lot for the answer
But you know, what I really want is the limit
I mean if it's about two nuclei where is the exact limit where I can neglect the interactoin energy?!
does it really have a line as a limit?
 
shadi_s10 said:
Thanks a lot for the answer
But you know, what I really want is the limit
I mean if it's about two nuclei where is the exact limit where I can neglect the interactoin energy?!
does it really have a line as a limit?

I'm no expert, so all I can provide is a general view.

I think it depends on how much you want from the "EXACT limit", or how you define it. Take the notion of atomic orbital as an example. Some people say, it's the region where the probability of finding the electron is about 90%. The number 90% is just a formal number. You can probably find an electron here and there.

The same thing for the limit of interaction. I don't know the exact formula for strong interaction, but it should decrease tremendously with distance, just like gravitation, so I'll take gravitation as an example. It's obvious that gravitational interaction between Earth and Sun is significant, while one between Sun and a person on Earth is negligible, and instead, that between Earth and the person is not negligible. So it's relative.

For strong interaction between nuclei, I would say if the 2 nuclei are taken apart at a distance of about more than nuclear diameter, the interaction is a lot weakened and if it's about atomic radius, it's negligible. But as I said, it's just an estimated number; there is no exact answer.
 
thanks a lot for your help
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
721
Replies
4
Views
551
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K