Stephen Wolfram: Computing a theory of everything TED Video April 2010

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stephen Wolfram's TED Talk, "Computing a Theory of Everything," presents groundbreaking ideas about the nature of the universe, emphasizing its computational aspects. He asserts that the universe may be represented as a network and introduces graphical representations of candidate universes derived from his models. Wolfram claims that these models align with the standard representations of gravity, special relativity, and general relativity, while hinting at quantum mechanics. He challenges the scientific community to develop a complete Theory of the Universe by the end of the decade, positioning computation as a central theme for future discoveries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of computational theory and its implications.
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of physics.
  • Knowledge of concepts in general relativity and special relativity.
  • Awareness of quantum mechanics fundamentals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "computational irreducibility" and its significance in physics.
  • Explore Wolfram's models and their graphical representations of candidate universes.
  • Investigate the relationship between computation and emergent phenomena in physics.
  • Study the implications of Wolfram's challenge for future theoretical physics research.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, computational theorists, and anyone interested in the intersection of computation and fundamental physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those exploring new theories of the universe.

rhody
Gold Member
Messages
679
Reaction score
3
Thought you might like this...

This http://www.ted.com/talks/stephen_wo..._campaign=newsletter_weekly&utm_medium=email" by Stephen Wolfram is about 20 minutes long, but the most interesting parts are from 14:10 or so to about 17:30.

Summary:

14:10 Somewhere out in the computational Universe we might find our physical Universe.​
14:50 Universe behaves like some kind of Network.​
15:10 He shows to the public (for the first time, a graphic representing candidate Universes) based on his models.
15:45 States that the Universe is: full of computational irreducibility.
16:00 Claims he has produced candidate Universes that produce the standard models representation of gravity, special relativity, general relativity, and hints of quantum mechanics (does not mention QED or QCD Theory) however.​

16:45 Issues a challenge that by the end of the decade he believes a correct Theory of the Universe can be achieved.​

17:20 Computation is destined to be the defining idea of our future.​

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
rhody said:
Thought you might like this...

This http://www.ted.com/talks/stephen_wo..._campaign=newsletter_weekly&utm_medium=email" by Stephen Wolfram is about 20 minutes long, but the most interesting parts are from 14:10 or so to about 17:30.

Summary:

14:10 Somewhere out in the computational Universe we might find our physical Universe.​
14:50 Universe behaves like some kind of Network.​
15:10 He shows to the public (for the first time, a graphic representing candidate Universes) based on his models.
15:45 States that the Universe is: full of computational irreducibility.
16:00 Claims he has produced candidate Universes that produce the standard models representation of gravity, special relativity, general relativity, and hints of quantum mechanics (does not mention QED, QCD, weak nuclear force, radioactive decay) however.​

16:45 Issues a challenge that by the end of the decade he believes a correct Theory of the Universe can be achieved.​

17:20 Computation is destined to be the defining idea of our future.​

Rhody...

I had some time to digest what he said last evening. If these statements were made by anyone except Stephen Wolfram, I would have dismissed them as being outright crackpottery. That being said, it seems he is a devotee of the "emergent thinking" train of thought that has become popular in the last five years of so with a small but seemingly growing number of physicists.

Does anyone have anything to say about coming up with a compete Theory of the Universe in the next decade ? Thats a pretty bold audacious statement. I should qualify that, one that agrees with the Standard Model and all of the tests that make it what we believe true to date.

Note: I edited my summary above, 16:00 for theories his models does not address.

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
827
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K