Steven Chu - the new Energy Secretary

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appointment of Steven Chu as the new Energy Secretary, focusing on his background, qualifications, and the implications of his selection for energy policy and scientific advocacy in the context of the Obama administration. Participants explore themes related to scientific leadership in government, comparisons with previous energy secretaries, and the importance of research in alternative energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express enthusiasm about Steven Chu's appointment, citing his Nobel Prize and advocacy for scientific solutions to climate change as positive attributes.
  • Others argue that Chu's scientific background contrasts with previous energy secretaries, suggesting that his expertise may lead to better energy policies.
  • Concerns are raised regarding Chu's experience in nuclear energy and weapons policy, with some suggesting he may need to rely on advisers for these areas.
  • Several participants critique the qualifications of previous energy secretaries, particularly Samuel Bodman and Spencer Abraham, highlighting their non-scientific backgrounds and questioning their effectiveness.
  • There is a discussion about the potential irony in the history of energy secretaries, with references to past appointments that some participants view as lacking in relevant expertise.
  • Participants mention Chu's current work at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, focusing on cleaner energy technologies and biofuels, as relevant to his new role.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Steven Chu's scientific background is a positive change for the role of Energy Secretary, but there is disagreement regarding the effectiveness of previous appointees and the implications of Chu's lack of experience in certain areas.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about whether the White House will heed scientific advice, reflecting a broader concern about the integration of scientific evidence in policy-making.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
...Announcements to come in the days ahead include several key environment-related appointments -- Steven Chu as energy secretary

...Chu is director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and shared the 1997 Nobel Prize in physics. He was an early advocate for scientific solutions to climate change...
http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSTRE4B970320081210

I once had the honor of meeting Dr. Chu.

What a great choice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, we will actually have a nobel laurate running the show. What a great choice.
 
In my opinion this is a great choice. One of my biggest criticisms of the Bush administration was their decision to constantly ignore scientific evidence in the formulation of their policies. Now with Obama, we will have a hardcore scientist in one of the top positions in his cabinet. Furthermore, at LBNL, Chu has really been a strong advocate of research into alternative energy sources, which probably speaks a lot about Obama's priorities in his energy policy. Chu may not have much experience in nuclear energy/weapons policy, one of the crucial areas overseen by the DOE, but, I'm sure he'll surround himself with plenty of advisers to help on those issues.
 
Samuel Bodman (current energy sec.) has a Sc D from MIT. Guess that's not hard core.
 
MIT stands for Missourri Institute of Tapdancing though
 
chemisttree said:
Samuel Bodman (current energy sec.) has a Sc D from MIT. Guess that's not hard core.
But he then went into straight into corporate finance for the last 30years.

The real question is wether anyone in the Whitehouse will listen.
 
Last edited:
Beyond that, Bodman is an engineer, not a scientist. His background is hardly comparable to that of Chu.
 
chemisttree said:
Samuel Bodman (current energy sec.) has a Sc D from MIT. Guess that's not hard core.
It's hardcore, alright, but it's 60s hardcore.

Also, let's not forget the previous Bush Energy Sec, Spencer Abraham, whose JD from Harvard Law and Senate career must have been useful qualifications. Naturally, you might expect he served on the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee. Umm ... not exactly, but he did serve in the Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee ]and he co-sponsored a bill in 1999, dealing with energy issues (S.896: Department of Energy Abolishment Act).

We need a Sec. of Irony.
 
I'm glad to hear about this pick. I'm not convinced about all the cabinet choices so far being good ones, but this one sounds like a good match of skills for the job. When it's a big push for R&D into alternative energies that is needed, it's good to have a scientist on board for setting those policies.
 
  • #10
Gokul43201 said:
he co-sponsored a bill in 1999, dealing with energy issues (S.896: Department of Energy Abolishment Act).

We need a Sec. of Irony.
Abolishing the DoE isn't necessarily a bad idea. The DoE runs particle physics research, renewable energy research and nuclear weapons - not an obvious partnership.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
And String Theory! No?
 
  • #12
A report from last year

Nobel Prize-winning physicist Steven Chu is leading the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's efforts to develop cleaner forms of energy, including new types of solar cells and new biofuels. He answered viewer questions about his research and the future of alternative fuels.

At the Lawrence Berkeley lab, Chu has focused on developing new fuel technologies to combat global warming. His efforts received a $500 million boost in February, when the energy company BP chose the lab, along with the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, to lead a new Energy Biosciences Institute devoted to developing biofuel technology.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/forum/science/jan-june07/chu_05-02.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Gokul43201 said:
Also, let's not forget the previous Bush Energy Sec, Spencer Abraham, whose JD from Harvard Law and Senate career must have been useful qualifications. Naturally, you might expect he served on the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee. Umm ... not exactly, but he did serve in the Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee ]and he co-sponsored a bill in 1999, dealing with energy issues (S.896: Department of Energy Abolishment Act).

We need a Sec. of Irony.

We always have had a Sec. of Irony/Sec. of Energy in that position! (until now, that is)

James Schlesinger - former Sec. Defense (appointed by Carter!)
Charles Duncan - former president of Duncan Coffee and Coca Cola
James Edwards - Dentist/politician
John Herrington - Attorney/politician
James Watkins - Former chairman of AIDS commission, Navy Operations Chief, MS Mech. Eng.
Hazel O'Leary - JD, Rutgers, resigned in disgrace over lavish travel expenses.
Fredrico Pena - JD, Mayor of Denver, headed DOT
Bill Richardson - MA School of Law and Diplomacy, former UN Ambassador
 
  • #14
chemisttree said:
James Schlesinger - former Sec. Defense (appointed by Carter!)
People also tend to forget that Carter graduated from the Naval Academy (finishing in the top 10 percentile of his graduating class), and served in the Navy till his father's death.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
15K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K