Stoke's law and its applications

  • Thread starter Thread starter logearav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applications Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Stoke's law and its implications, particularly in the context of a falling raindrop. Participants explore the relationship between forces acting on the raindrop, including gravitational, viscous, and buoyant forces, and how these relate to the concept of constant velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question how a raindrop can move with constant velocity when acceleration is zero, leading to discussions about the definitions of acceleration and motion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants clarifying their understanding of motion in the absence of acceleration. Some have expressed gratitude for the insights shared, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of acceleration and velocity, with participants examining the conditions under which a body remains in motion or comes to rest. The discussion reflects an exploration of fundamental physics concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Stoke's law states that retarding force is proportional to velocity. An example is falling rain drop in air.
My book states that " if a rain drop falls, it accelerates initially due to gravity. As the velocity increases, the retarding force force also increases. Finally, when viscous force plus buoyant force becomes equal to force due to gravity, the net force becomes zero and so does the acceleration.
The rain drop then descends with a constant velocity

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My question is, if acceleration is zero, how the rain drop would move with constant velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time. If acceleration is zero, how can the velocity change?
 
So, even if there is no acceleration, a body will move. Am I interpreted right?
Thanks for the reply Mr. Dick
 
logearav said:
So, even if there is no acceleration, a body will move. Am I interpreted right?
Thanks for the reply Mr. Dick

If a body is a rest and there is no acceleration, it will not start moving. If body is moving at velocity v and there is no acceleration then it will continue moving at velocity v.
 
I got it now. Thanks a lot Mr. Dick
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K