Graduate Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups and new observables?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of Stone's theorem regarding one-parameter unitary groups in quantum mechanics. It questions whether the current set of self-adjoint operators, specifically position and momentum, is exhaustive or if additional operators could exist. The conversation touches on the significance of spin as an observable but clarifies that the main inquiry is about the classification of one-parameter unitary groups. The participants seek to understand if any undiscovered groups could lead to new observables in quantum theory. The conclusion emphasizes the need for clarity on the existence of such groups and their potential implications for quantum mechanics.
victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Using unitary groups looking for new observables
I have been following the proof of the Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups.

The question is if the current list of self-adjoint operators used in quantum mechanics, including position and momentum operators, is exhaustive or not?

Put it another way, can we say that there is no other one-parameter unitary groups, that can give us yet new self-adjoint operators, in addition to position and momentum ones, and therefore new observables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course there's one more important, which is spin. In non-relativistic QM it's just another angular-momentum operator in addition to the orbital-angular momentum operator ##\hat{\vec{L}}=\hat{\vec{x}} \times \hat{\vec{p}}##. While the orbital-angular momentum realizes only integer-representations of the rotation group, ##\ell \in \{0,1,2,\ldots \}##, the spin realizes also half-integer representations (which are representations of the covering group SU(2) of the rotation group SO(3)).

In the representation with wave functions you get spinor-valued fields, transforming under rotations like
$$\psi_{\sigma}'(\vec{x}')=D_{\sigma,\sigma'}(R) \psi_{\sigma'} (R^{-1} \vec{x}),$$
here ##D_{\sigma,\sigma'}## with ##\sigma,\sigma' \in \{-s,-s+1,\ldots,s-1,s \}## (and using the Einstein summation convention) is the representation of the rotation ##R## for particles with spin ##s \in \{0,1/2,1,\ldots \}##.
 
Thanks so much for the reply.

But my point wasn't about spin.

I actually meant if there is a classification theorem on one parameter unitary groups.

Do we know now that there is no other such group that if exist at all then its generator will give us some yet unknown observable in quantum theory?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K