So I'm reading Gottfried and Yan's Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals. On page 284, They state Wigner's Theorem and explain the two cases. One transformation leads to(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); nocomplex conjugation of the expansion coefficients (unitary) and the other leads to a complex conjugation of the expansion coefficients (antiunitary). Anyway, I'm confused when he states the following.

Applying an antiunitary operator twice results in a unitary operation, since the expansion coefficients are conjugated twice. Therefore the antiunitary operators cannot be represented as a continuous group because for any such operation (call it A) there exists the square root of that operation (A_(1/2)), which when applied twice gives an A and thus any A in the continuous group must be unitary for self-consistency.

The part I don't get:

He then goes on to say "by the same argument, candidates for an antiunitary transformation must be such that A^2 reproduces the original description"

I don't understand why it necessarily has to reproduce the original description. I only understand why it has to be a discrete transformation. Anyone care to shed some light?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wigner's Theorem/Antiunitary Transformation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Wigner's Theorem Antiunitary | Date |
---|---|

A Why do space translations satisfy the Wigner's Theorem? | Dec 28, 2017 |

Wigner-Eckart theorem in Stark effect | Dec 28, 2014 |

Wigners Theorem And Linerarity | Apr 18, 2013 |

Sakurai proof Wigner-Eckart theorem | Sep 12, 2012 |

Wigner-Eckart theorem and reduced matrix element | Apr 6, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**