Stop Washington lobbyists (read legalized corruption)

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaap de vries
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the influence of lobbyists in Washington and the perceived corruption associated with lobbying practices, particularly in the context of upcoming presidential elections. Participants explore the implications of campaign contributions, the legality of lobbying, and potential reforms to address these issues.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that lobbying represents legalized corruption that undermines the interests of the general population and contributes to poor decision-making by elected officials.
  • Others propose capping campaign contributions and banning contributions from businesses and special interest groups to reduce the influence of money in politics.
  • Some participants assert that eliminating lobbying would require eliminating campaign contributions entirely, raising questions about the constitutional implications of such actions.
  • A few participants challenge the notion that lobbying can be outlawed without conflicting with constitutional rights, particularly the First Amendment.
  • Hypothetical scenarios are presented to explore the nuances of what constitutes bribery in the context of campaign contributions and lobbying.
  • Concerns are raised about the influence of corporations on political decisions and the moral implications of relying on corporate funding for political campaigns.
  • Some participants note the difficulty in finding a practical way to ban corporate influence without infringing on the rights of individuals to support candidates and causes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the issue, with no clear consensus reached. Disagreements persist regarding the legality and morality of lobbying practices, the role of campaign contributions, and potential reforms.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the issue, including the constitutional protections surrounding free speech and campaign contributions, as well as the challenges in addressing the influence of money in politics without creating contradictions in existing laws.

  • #31
So back to the disputed point:
I too think professional lobbying is counter-democratic. I agree that the problem is to put that ideal into practice. The question I see therefor is: by what criteria can professional lobbyism be distinguished from healthy democratic practices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If you read the book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins it should scare the hell out of you. Our Republic remains in name only. We are now in the grips of a corporatocracy. This has focused all our foriegn policy upon American Empire building based on "Manifest Destiny"...the deeper you dig, the scarier it gets, and you will understand why people fly airplanes into our buildings. hg
 
  • #33
hubertg said:
you will understand why people fly airplanes into our buildings. hg
The murder of thousands of innocent people can never be justified. That you would suggest that this kind of behavior is understandable based on lobbying is quite preposterous.
 
  • #34
The only way to significantly reduce the impact of lobbying in a democracy with 1st amendment protections is to reduce the economic size of the government.
 
  • #35
mheslep said:
The only way to significantly reduce the impact of lobbying in a democracy with 1st amendment protections is to reduce the economic size of the government.
There is another way. Outlaw bribery in the form of gifts, trips, hiring relatives for do-nothing jobs, and lavish speaking fees. I can't afford to pay my senators $20,000 to talk to me at breakfast, so I get form letters and lobbyists get face-time.

Our constitution was written to protect the rights of individuals, not to allow corporations and wealthy special interest groups to hijack our government by bribing our representatives. Some of the early retirements being announced by congressmen and senators seem to aimed at avoiding the 2-year wait that will soon be imposed on them if they want to join lobbying firms. If they retire before the end of the year, they only have to wait 1 year before collecting their paybacks.
 
  • #36
turbo-1 said:
There is another way. Outlaw bribery in the form of gifts, trips, hiring relatives for do-nothing jobs, and lavish speaking fees. I can't afford to pay my senators $20,000 to talk to me at breakfast, so I get form letters and lobbyists get face-time.

Our constitution was written to protect the rights of individuals, not to allow corporations and wealthy special interest groups to hijack our government by bribing our representatives. Some of the early retirements being announced by congressmen and senators seem to aimed at avoiding the 2-year wait that will soon be imposed on them if they want to join lobbying firms. If they retire before the end of the year, they only have to wait 1 year before collecting their paybacks.
A worthy goal, but I don't see these suggestions accomplishing it. Lobbying is a sophisticated business. If you cut off direct contribution to politicians then ancillary parties start collecting more cash (Repub Party, Dem. Party) and they become powerful. Recall the 19th century Boss systems. Lobbyists also have what they call 'grass roots' campaigns in which a special interest will directly fund operations in the districts, not in DC, with employers, unions, etc. which need have no contact with official political organizations at all (they do, but need not). If you have cut off all funding to your politician, then he/she doesn't have the means to counter that in their districts. Mr Smith Goes to Washington is an illustrative dramatization. The general point is that given a large government big money sees it to be in its interest to manipulate the govt. process as much as possible.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Lobbyist are professional constituents; they happen to devote their time and effort toward the business of their client inorder to serve a district(s).
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K