- #31
ThomasT
- 529
- 0
It's based on the fact that lots of people are angry at, or even hate, the US.Nusc said:
Bin Laden is also bitterly opposed to the corrupt and repressive
- Context: News
- Thread starter Nusc
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Bin
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the motivations behind the 9/11 attacks, exploring whether these motivations are primarily religious, economic, or a combination of factors. Participants examine the roles of cultural identity, political grievances, and the influence of Western policies in the Middle East.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that Bin Laden's opposition to U.S. support for corrupt regimes and the Israeli occupation is a significant motivation behind the attacks.
- Others argue that terrorism itself is an action rather than a motivation, emphasizing a sense of outrage against the U.S. as a driving force for the attackers.
- A participant questions the notion that religious beliefs are the primary motivator, citing examples of secular groups like the Tamil Tigers and the varied backgrounds of the hijackers.
- Another viewpoint highlights the economic implications of religious beliefs, suggesting that economic disparities and the concentration of wealth contribute to motivations for violence.
- Some participants express uncertainty about the motivations behind the attacks, calling for a more thorough investigation into the factors involved.
- One participant posits that the loss of cultural identity due to Western influence and consumerism may be a root motivation for the terrorist movement.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the motivations behind the 9/11 attacks, with multiple competing views remaining. Some emphasize religious motivations, while others focus on economic and cultural factors.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge the complexity of motivations and the lack of definitive evidence to support any single theory. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives without resolving the underlying uncertainties.